English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-30 09:28:47 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pets Other - Pets

6 answers

Ulysses Grant was the final commander of the Union Army. He was already famous for his victories in the West when he was appointed Lieutenant General and general-in-chief of the Union Army in March 1864. Grant supervised the Army of the Potomac (which was formally led by his subordinate, Maj. Gen. George G. Meade) in delivering the final knockout punches to the Confederacy by decisively defeating Confederate forces in many fierce battles in Virginia, eventually capturing the capital of the Confederacy itself, Richmond. He developed the strategy of coordinated simultaneous thrusts against wide portions of the Confederacy, most importantly the Georgia and Carolinas Campaigns of William Tecumseh Sherman and the Shenandoah Valley campaign of Philip Sheridan. These campaigns were characterized by another strategic notion of Grant's—deny the enemy the supplies needed to continue the war by widespread destruction of its factories and farms along the paths of the invading Union armies.

Grant had critics who complained about the atrociously high numbers of casualties that the Union Army suffered while he was in charge, but Lincoln would not replace Grant, because, in Lincoln's words: "I cannot spare this man. He fights."

2006-07-30 09:35:29 · answer #1 · answered by confusedbuthappy 3 · 0 0

?a million. whilst naming twins or triplets, what form of subject could you maintain on with if any? None. i do no longer purely like the assumption of matching names for siblings in any respect. if actuality be told, i'm so insanely against it, that I definitely have considerable themes with determining on my wide-unfold call out of two that proportion the comparable preliminary (eg. Astrid and August). ?2. How significant do you think of this is for sibsets to examine? See above. Sibling names ought to by no ability experience, despite if, they could desire to additionally no longer be polar opposites. to illustrate, Mary and Bryleigh could be ******* horrific for sisters. I advise, Mary is alluring and woman and classic, and Bryleigh is... nicely, Bryleigh. ?3. what's your #a million to blame excitement first call for a girl? I definitely have too many! i think if I had to choose for, it could be Daenerys. No, i won't be in a position of choose for. do no longer make me. ?4. what's your #a million to blame excitement first call for a boy? lower back, I definitely have too bloody many. If forced to choose for, i could attempt and choose Draco. yet i won't be in a position of. ?5. what's a flexible boy call, (a variety of of nicknames)? Theodore - Theo, Ted, Teddy Edward - Ed, Eddie, Ned, Ted, Teddy Robert - Rob, Robbie, Bob, Bobby, Robin William - Will, invoice, Billy, Willy, Liam (arguable) Christopher - Chris, Topher, equipment, Chip Alexander - Alex, Xander, Sacha, Lex ?6. Pretentious names - what are some examples of names you hit upon pretentious? Are Evangeline or Jacqueline pretentious? i do no longer locate those names pretentious. They end the 1st risk they get to end. Names i locate pretentious are Sophia, Annabella, and Gabriella. They could no longer in basic terms stop at Sophie, Annabel, or Gabrielle, no. they had to maintain going and upload a pointless -a on the tip, making the names sound overly frilly and much too attempt-stressful. ?7. what's your #a million long and #a million short first call for women folk (a million of each)? Cordelia and Lily (i bypass with the aid of long and short in the two sound and spelling, with the aid of fact in any different case i could choose for Phoebe for the fast call). ?8. comparable for boys? Dorian and Rory.

2016-10-08 12:15:21 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Pay attention to the section you put your question in next time.

2006-07-30 14:18:34 · answer #3 · answered by axelflame8 2 · 0 0

Henry W. Halleck. This shouldnt' be in pets.

2006-07-30 09:36:36 · answer #4 · answered by Lupin IV 6 · 0 0

Ulysses S. Grant.

and WHY IS THIS IN THE PETS SECTION???

2006-07-30 10:14:00 · answer #5 · answered by Paigey 3 · 0 0

I don't know, but it certainly doesn't belong in the "pets - other pets" question section.

2006-07-30 09:32:27 · answer #6 · answered by Robin 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers