2006-07-30 09:15:11 · 17 answers · asked by mitas111801 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
Of course, that's why gay marriage is legal here in Canada. Whatever a person's religious or personal belief is about homosexuality, there is absolutely no reasoning behind not allowing same-sex couples basic human rights. In the famous words of former Prime Minisiter Pierre Elliot Trudeau: "The state has no business in the bedrooms of the nation."
2006-07-30 09:28:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 3⤋
hell yeah! they have the rights 2 everything except marriage. they should have the same rights as well as straight couples.
2006-07-30 09:47:22 · answer #2 · answered by emilytobey@sbcglobal.net 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, because if I got married to a man, we wouldn't be less or have less rights than a man and a woman.
2006-07-30 13:10:35 · answer #3 · answered by Adam G 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Without a doubt in my mind. Everyone person is equal and so is every couple.
Signed Concerned Citizen
2006-07-30 11:01:03 · answer #4 · answered by Aaron A 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in spite of being a non secular believer in God, besides the reality that i'm form of secular. i've got faith there might desire to be gay marriage, in spite of the shown fact that everybody might desire to admire everybody's ideals. So yeah, the clergymen rabbis and imams think of its a sin, yet i propose isn't there a genuine properly-typical rule that all of us comprehend because of the fact the Golden Rule? Love your neighbor as your self. you may not define that line from now on effective. they don't have the properly suited to all of a unexpected say gay human beings will circulate to hell, basically the Almighty shall make that desicion. in spite of being a sin, they are not right here to harm all people and it quite is the reason in spite of believing a sin I settle for that. God extra unfastened will, consequently in the event that they don't think of what they are doing is a sin than what ever, i comprehend they are not right here to harm all people. in spite of the shown fact that the homosexuals might desire to be admire the reality those human beings will save their faith to themselves, and consequently fairly should not be asked to marry them. I propose it quite is offensive because of the fact they are asking to do something they have faith is misguided. in spite of marriage's religious magnitude, it quite is genuine meaning is to be committed to the guy so which you like. without or with God, they are able to apply jewelry of their own and make their own ceremony that they are asserting to each they are going to stay together by using thick and skinny till finally death seperates. final analysis, no person might desire to harm all people. All might desire to admire the different. final analysis: Love your neighbor as your self think of of it what ever you like, yet as quickly as human beings shall stay by using that sentence it is going to be a appropriate international.
2016-12-11 03:06:09 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ABSOLUTELY! The gov't accepts a gay person's tax dollars...right? But doesn't want to give them the same rights as everybody else. w/ our current administration, it is TAKE AND NO GIVE.
2006-07-30 09:29:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I don't think so. I think that if you are gay then you should just leave it in your on private life. I don't think gays should get married. I believe marriage is between a woman and a man only.
2006-07-30 09:17:49 · answer #7 · answered by ♥Jessica♥ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
2006-07-30 09:32:53 · answer #8 · answered by Alex62 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what are these rights and benefits that straight couples have? i keep hearing about them but what are they?
2006-07-30 09:19:16 · answer #9 · answered by mr_soapytitwank 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes and most especially when there are children involved.
2006-07-30 09:24:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋