If a war of this type was going on between 2 neighbouring European nations & 50/60 women & kids were killed now and then & all the infrastucture being anayalated do you think we would all be sitting back as we are & Blair & Bush having a casual natter about when enough is enough?
2006-07-30 09:11:41 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
They are not sitting back. They are in contact with Israeli forces at all time because we are taking care of logistics like we always do with our allies. We are not getting directly involved because we are finally getting some others to pull their weight in the war on terror. From the first shot on 9/11 we have done most of the work and dying so we can git rid of this radical Islamic Cancer on the free world.
2006-07-30 09:26:47 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
there are various much less conflict interior the international now than what it became in basic terms some years in the past, we are shifting forward, yet its taking its time. people don't have one wakeful, meaning there is a good style of artwork to pass via before something like peace could be restored, and definite i say restored with the aid of fact there have been a time whilst people did no longer combat one yet another. In our first degree of cultural evolution, approximately 7000 years in the past. there have been little or no conflict. yet considering then there has been a good style of it. you would be happy that we in the present day has the smallest quantity of conflict in approximately 7000 years. this is an uplifting thought. i don't be responsive to if international peace is sensible or maybe possible. And there are lots of people who's fairly fairly attempting troublesome to make peace, and their efforts isn't a waste. its basically that the international is so huge. And it takes an prolonged time to make a vast difference. some human beings do no longer look to love peace :/ i think this is as a results of the fact they earnings from conflict, and that they are slowing the proses down yet its fortuitously going forward
2016-11-03 07:57:19 · answer #2 · answered by aguas 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush isn't sitting back. he is sending bombs to Israelis to kill innocent people in Lebanon.
God save Lebanon and long live Hassan NasrAllah
2006-07-30 09:30:15 · answer #3 · answered by mo_rashad 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
even though u cant fight our war that isnt your own and we had 2 get involved 2 evacuate our people, america will make things worse. Bush always does. *p.s have nothing against americans*
2006-07-30 09:47:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
At this point, with Bush anyway, yes.
You don't get it. The guy is paralyzed now. He cannot make a decision.
We have a huge problem on our hands. It is called our president.
-Dio
2006-07-30 09:16:49 · answer #5 · answered by diogenese19348 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hessbolagh are a terrorist group and if u ask me they deserve everything they get. and as for blaire and bush getting involved, why the hell should they?
2006-07-30 09:20:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No we wouldn't be sitting back. But Israel and the US are more or less the same thing.
2006-07-30 09:15:03 · answer #7 · answered by Mean Mr Mustard 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why don't you mention the Israelis killed? How hypocritical!
2006-07-30 09:18:19 · answer #8 · answered by composertype 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why should the US and UK get involved? It's not our war to fight.
2006-07-30 09:15:09 · answer #9 · answered by Amy H 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
thats a war that they need to fight themselves we(U.S.) and the UK have bigger problems in Iraq
2006-07-30 14:27:33 · answer #10 · answered by novaicedogs9 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋