More Nostradamus crap. That guy was a compleat fake. First, second, and third anti-Christ. Please!
2006-08-02 09:00:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by dee 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
First Nostradamus did not say there would be three. I have the book and I've read it. People thought that Napoleon and Hitler were the end times. The Russians thought the end times will in the 12th century. There have been many end times. Yet here we still are. We (the United States) are not taking over anyone. If we were, it would sure as hell be a whole lot easier. Yes, we do have that kind of fire power. Grow up and turn off what ever channel is feeding you this tripe.
2006-07-30 16:10:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are only half right. Most of the people who believe Bush is the 3rd anti-Christ always mention Osama too.
They usually put the two names osaMA and BUSh together to form the name Mabus like this:
osaMABUSh
But that's all I know on the subject. I do not think Bush OR Osama have done enough evil to warrant the title of Anti-Christ yet and I certainly never rank them among Napoleon or Hitler.
2006-07-30 16:42:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by broxolm 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
For some people is the third Antichrist, Putin...who is, by far, more clever and lethal, then Bush. I guess most countries have their own Antichrist... the reality is... each one of them deserves the name. It is sad, for us... who accepts being puppet in their hand.
Although the name comes close, you are right.
And whoever stated Nostradamus did not say that...you are an ignorant fool, read it, before you talk about.
2006-07-30 16:17:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by zaraza 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Someone told me "Mabus" referred to Saddam. Or rather "Sudam" Look at it backwards. In a mirror, that b could be a d.
Then there's the "osaMA" plus "BUSh" thing.
"Mabus will soon die, then will come,
A horrible undoing of people and animals,
At once one will see vengeance,
One hundred powers, thirst, famine, when the comet will pass."
2006-07-30 16:09:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Steph 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The third AntiChrist would be the one who comes during the middle of the great tribulation. George W Bush believes in Bush therefore he isn't a antichrist. A antichrist is one who doesn't believe(anti) in Jesus (christ).
2006-07-30 16:27:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by rltouhe 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
This question ever come in my mind too, I guess Mabus is Bush.
But i think he is not the 3rd antiChrist, maybe because him The 3rd antiChrist be came. Who knows, maybe the 3rd antiChrist born/from Asia. We just can live under God when something the 3rd antiChrist come..
2006-07-30 16:17:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by fenomenologi_x 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dude Karl Rove is the Anti-Christ? Bush is glove to keep Roves hands warm.
2006-07-30 16:26:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by aplusjimages 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
As far back as I can remember, whenever there is a Republican in the White house, this question comes up.
No, he isn't the anti-Christ. Just a money/oil hungry businessman who is willing to send other people's children to die to further his agenda!!!
2006-07-30 16:07:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by tina m 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
stupid question...is that supposed to be clever? Become an entrepreneur...take some financial risks, employ some people and contribute something to society....
Then I'll check back with you...and see if you want to discuss politics after you've learned some responsibility.
2006-07-30 16:10:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Idiot Savant 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If he is trying to take over the world he is doing a piss poor job of it. As to your question, I have no idea.
2006-07-30 16:08:02
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋