2006-07-30 08:28:21 · 8 answers · asked by <3Priscyla 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
war should be last resource. But in this case it is the first. we call them terrorists but they call us terrorists. Who is real one it is hard to say. This is no win situation. but we must find the way to live together in this small planet. Maybe future politicians will implement more diplomacy...
2006-07-30 08:38:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We should be at war with terrorist's > terrorism is the broad term for what they do. There is a distinctive difference in the terms in regard to presidential authority. We can search out terrorists and put a face on them ! The president uses the word terrorism to provide an excuse for underhanded behind the scenes action in order to gain authority not afforded a president by the constitution , hence the hundreds of signing statements , illegal wiretapping , telephones, bank accounts, Internet use etc.
2006-07-30 08:51:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There was no reason for this "war" It was orchestrated to benefit those in charge and the oil companies. For one thing, terrorism will NEVER be totally destoyed by anybody....it can't be. And for another thing, exactly what kind of opinion do you think all the little Iraqi children who have lost their parents/possibly even seen them killed before their eyes, will feel towards america when they grow up??? And would you blame them? Alot of them will feel contempt and hatred (and w/ good reason) towards america. Might that regenerate more terrorism??? WAR DOES NOT SOLVE ANYTHING! It creates opporunity for more wars in the future, that's all. And the poor people who are duped into believing in "American pride" are gullible enough to go fight the wars for the rich.....just like always. Basically what happened was some terrorists blew up some building on U.S. soil...........and we hostily invaded the Iraqi people, some of them not even knowing what was going on. PLEASE DO NOT BELIEVE ALL THE PROPAGANDA put out by your local news! Cuz if you do, I have a bridge I would like to sell you.....
2006-07-30 08:50:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. What else could we do? If the news that we had information about nukes leaked out there would be an outrage. Like the one because we did something about it. If we do nothing, someone gets mad, if we do something, someone gets mad. Everything anyone does makes someone mad. Fact of life. The anti-war supportors should be happy, now they have a lesser chance of GETTING BLOWN UP.
2006-07-30 08:33:07 · answer #4 · answered by Greg 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Islamic Extremism cannot be bought off, developed away, or erased by diplomacy. After 27 years we have finally reacted to a very real, very deadly problem. And we are the bad guys?
2006-07-30 08:33:32 · answer #5 · answered by claymore 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
against is what you were trying to say. my uneducated answer is yes. it all has to do with oil. we were attacked for a reason, we have no clue as to what our country is doing overseas or at home. history tells us that a war is the best way to get out of a finacial depression. you can take it from there.
2006-07-30 08:40:30 · answer #6 · answered by chris l 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The terriorists get the kids at 5 yrs of age and start brain washing them to kill as their sole purpose on earth! They are taught that they are the chosen ones to die and it is the greatest thing on earth to blow themselves up! They know nothing else and they are to be pitied but should be done away with.
2006-07-30 08:39:00 · answer #7 · answered by question212 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the past it was called war on communism. now its called war on terrorism. the funny part is the allies on war on communism are now the enemy on war on terrorism. Can you dig that one
2006-07-30 08:45:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋