2006-07-30 07:36:49 · 7 answers · asked by ma_2st 2 in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
Their commonality is that both are criminals. There is no class system in the US penal system. They committed crimes against society and are sent to the same prisons.
What may have distinguished them from each other on the outside, has no bearing on their treatment in prison.
2006-07-30 07:53:18 · answer #1 · answered by Buffy 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is not classified as white and blue collar....more non-violent and violent criminals. Therefore, because white collar crime is classified as non-violent (though some body is usually left hurt in the wallet) they do not go to maximum security prisons. Whereas violent criminals usually go to maximum security prison.
2006-07-30 14:59:13 · answer #2 · answered by BritLdy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
White collar criminals are, as a rule, non-violent people who commit crimes against property involving money and fraud. Violent criminals may also commit property crimes, but they frequently also commit the most violent crimes up to and including murder and other heinous crimes. White collar criminals are often sent to low or medium security prisons. Hardened criminals are sent to maximum security prisons.
2006-07-30 19:39:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Because there would be a collar war. Hardened criminal s would have the upper hand..or not?
2006-07-30 14:40:29 · answer #4 · answered by McDreamy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
white collar wouldn't survive...so,no
2006-07-30 15:43:45 · answer #5 · answered by maharet 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, they should. Good point.
2006-07-30 14:43:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
CRIMINALS SHOULD ALL BE TREATED ALIKE NO MATTER WHAT.
2006-07-30 17:05:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋