That is all they seem to do. No solutions, just 'liberal this' and 'neo con that'. It happens in Yahoo! Answers all the time and on every friggin blog that has anything to do with politics (examples below).
Do you think we will ever be the America we used to be when the parties could at least DISCUSS a middle ground?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Auf17XlDAbNwIWCxm8aiqITzy6IX?qid=20060730104807AAsbbG1
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AuuLt89KZ7J9zm7a84xgi5fzy6IX?qid=20060730103744AAXGOBO
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AqE9PIwA2dCVNo.AuFEkV_Pzy6IX?qid=20060730102811AAfSiVN
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Au0w0FzNGmE0GDl6..CeNrvzy6IX?qid=20060730102135AAwXvZD
2006-07-30 06:56:03 · 8 answers · asked by DEP 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Okay, morons like Paul W and his 'moderate' counter part senior citizen need to read the question.
Paul - i don't care why YOU hate liberals. I don't care why anyone may hate conservatives. I was simply curious as to why people like you spout off rhetoric that is obviously focused on destruction of the other party versus resolution to problems.
You see the state of America? You see how it is polarized? Your doing, Paul and the doings of others like you.
2006-07-30 08:24:26 · update #1
Paul, I am not a liberal. If you could rest your 'poiting finger' for a minute and click on my questions and responses, you would see that. I don't blame your ignorance nor your lack of self control on being conservative.
I blame it on the constant ingestion of paint chips. You should stop that.
2006-07-30 11:17:11 · update #2
Liberals are communists at heart they talk about inclusion love
tolerance etc.They make me sick to my stomach. They bring nothing to the table. Rarely have they started a business and been successful , innovated a new product , invention , technology that has brought value to this Republic they are bottom feeders and trying to work with that sort of mentality is impossible. They seek to empower either themselves or the government at the expense of people who are actually productive. Why dont give me a break!!
I have absolutely no respect for 99% of those clowns. They live in a dream world with pretty colors and free health care - they get raises on a regular basis - and hold a job they really don't qualify for but because they are under represented in this field they get the job anyway etc. Need I really go much further .THEY ARE SPIROCHETES- OKAY - FIND OUT WHAT THEY ARE AND YOU'LL KNOW WHAT A DAMN LIBERAL IS !
2006-07-30 08:05:57 · answer #1 · answered by PAUL W 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Paul is one of the reasons I bash repuke's, he is a no knowledge know it all. To get to your question Ronald Reagan began the deep division in this country by trying to make liberal a dirty word. If you remember his acceptance speech he referred to liberal as a four letter word. He went on to divide the classes with his trickle down economics which put this country into a deep recession as supply side economics's has never worked. It makes the rich, richer and the medium class without a job. The poor get poorer, and the middle class joins them. Paul and those like him do not have a original though, they get all of their news from Faux news and all their opinions from Rush Limbaugh. I will never get over how they bashed the best president in over 40 years. Bill Clinton, and I intend to do the same thing with Bush for his entire term.
2006-07-30 16:19:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Funny thing is, I think that is why all the bashing. We are learning from each other. The bashing is a form of probing for information. Sometimes arguments can get pretty heated, and still lead to some damn good resolutions. I know that I have found some of the rights's ideas useful. I think they too have learned a few things from me. These fights, with words, are useful in the learning process.
2006-07-30 14:02:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The problem today is that the two parties are controlled by the lunatic fringes of both ... and they are so intransigent in their beliefs and approach that you are "either with us or against us".
They want us to support *everything* they espouse ... or we are the enemy.
The first party that wises up and nominates moderate candidates will sweep into office with those candidates with an overwhelming majority.
I see it like this: The Dems control 20% (their "faithful") ... the GOP controls 20% (their "faithful") ... and the 60% of us in the middle have to choose between the extremes.
For the moment.
2006-07-30 14:00:06 · answer #4 · answered by Rob R 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's all about power. The best the Democrats have to offer is moderate Senator Joe Lieberman, and they don't WANT him because he's a moderate.
2006-07-30 14:03:47 · answer #5 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is alot at steak here. its money mostly to put it simply. if the gop wins corparations like big oil, drug companies for examole do not pay taxes in the case of the drug companies bush gave them billions for no apperant reason other than they backed him in his election. also war brings in big money. follow the money here and you see bush himself and gop interests or collecting big here. if the dems. win workers make big gains in wages as a rule and is proven in american history. also the sick and poor fair alot better and as far as war=money if dems win this war being waged now would not be taking place which=alot less death in the world which=better for the common people again history proves this to be in the dems. plans. i say again alot at steak. good question thanks.
2006-07-30 14:17:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
People have nothing better to do than blame the "other guy"
2006-07-30 13:59:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Used to be" is gone. Bashing is in. People love a good, dirty fight.
2006-07-30 13:59:56 · answer #8 · answered by BP 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋