2006-07-30 06:48:26 · 6 answers · asked by shabu 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
hey you got your penut butter on my chocolate!
No! you got your chocolate in my penut butter! (bite bite bite)
Hey! Thats good!!!!
2006-07-30 06:59:50 · answer #1 · answered by prancingmonkey 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Defenders have a better reason to win than the Occupiers whose only aim is profit and oil and The New World Order.Defenders usually win in the long run,just like Viet Nam and Korea.Nazi George will not win in Iraq or the middle east for that matter.All that monkey boy has accomplished is the killing of 6 to 10 American soldiers everyday that this war has been going on.
2006-07-30 13:53:37 · answer #2 · answered by theforce51 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That question is way to vague.
Why are the occupiers there? What are the defenders defending?
In most case we would throw stones at the O and praise the D for making a stand. BUT in some cases we NEED the O. And the D is supporting an archaic or dictatorial regime.
TFTP
2006-07-30 13:53:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on what the occupiers are occupying,and what the defenders are defending.
2006-07-30 13:52:52 · answer #4 · answered by luther 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on who is occupying, and why.
2006-07-30 13:50:08 · answer #5 · answered by timm1776 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what do you mean by "better"?
2006-07-30 13:51:07 · answer #6 · answered by nuclearemperor 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋