Opinions are like butt's, everybody's got one and they stink.
I'm not dumb, I've got a bachelors degree in Fire and Safety Engineering Technology. I've been a firefighter for a long time now and I love my job. I lost 343 brothers during the attacks on 9/11. I have no problem being over in Afghanistan and I have no problem being over in Iraq right now. I'm considering leaving my job to join the Air Force to go to Iraq or Afghanistan for a while and fight fire over there.
Gore lost the moment he admitted he was planning on taking firearms away from everyone, he wanted police officers to have to leave their firearms at work in a locker when they were off duty. If that situation had happened, the only people with guns would be the criminals...you'd have no way to defend yourself.
Secondly, Clinton may have saved money and kept gas prices down, but anyone thats ever taken a simple economics class will know that Supply and Demand sets the price for everything. America relies on fuels to be able to do everything and due to the increase in demand over the years the oil company has stepped up and raised their prices.
If that's unlawful, then when something happens and the prices at the grocery store on corn or bread goes up do we need to prosecute them as well?
You don't like the prices on gas, then buy a bike that's all I can tell you.
2006-07-30 06:03:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Skot M 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
NO that should be GW Bush! The tax cut back he gave in his first twelve months continues to be affecting the economic device in the present day! Bush ordered Freddie and Fannie to make $six hundred billion obtainable to first time minorityhome shoppers!He additionally made it obtainable for those shoppers to purchase with out putting down a downpayment!He additionally eradicated the regulation requiring loan companies to verify earnings in determining whether or to no longer approve those loans.in accordance to Bush the loan companies might confirm suspicious application with the aid of fact it could be of their terrific hobbies! The housing disaster became a brilliant effect wasn't it? do you opt for for to talk approximately how he believed the "data" to justify invading Iraq?
2016-11-03 07:41:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes it is true. Some people are so stupid they think when we are attacked the best to do is to defend ourselves. All the real smart people know we should surrender, and manipulate the situation to gain political advantage.
2006-07-30 06:00:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Roadkill 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, sweetheart. That's another one of your neoliberal lies. I've got two degrees, one of which I earned with a 4.0 and an invitation to the charter organization of the honor society for that degree. How about you?
2006-07-30 05:54:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, dumb people support the dumb.
2006-07-30 06:00:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by !{¤©¤}! 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No it is not true. He is also supported by several smart people who are extremely greedy.
2006-07-30 05:55:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ranto 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh if the liberals could only be honest with themselves, and others.
2006-07-30 06:51:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Looooooooooooooooooser!!!!!!!!!!!! Let me guess You are the only person that lives on your street
2006-07-30 06:48:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
so you're calling yourself stupid, why don't you move to where the smart people live?
jack-hole
2006-07-30 05:56:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by mason x 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
thats true. You forgot the deaf as well.
2006-07-30 06:01:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by devil 2
·
0⤊
0⤋