Neither... More dangerous are Bill/Hillary Clinton and dumb democrats...
2006-07-30 05:18:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
George Bush, he is more dangerous to the world than a meteor shower as we have never had a devastating meteor, but we have had two George Bush's both of them failures.
2006-07-30 05:26:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
George Bush, because he wouldn't be able to find a way to stop the meteor rain fall.
2006-07-30 05:17:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lavina 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
George Bush cause hell stick his nose up anyones *** just to start a war!! you know his dad was a pretty good guy but bush is ridiculous!!! at least if a meteor hits bush isnt going to send our hard men over to invistigate!! or will he??? haha
2006-07-30 05:23:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by cutenwild1769 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
A meteor would destroy the earth in most cases so I would have to say meteor
2006-07-30 05:17:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by bumpocooper 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Goerge W.Bush. cuz his a dumb a.s.s!plus beavisand butthead
would do better job as president and vice.better than those two Dork in power now!.
that zoo2626 is a dork too!.lol..
2006-07-30 05:23:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Presidente 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nature is always more power full then men, so didn't you see the Katrina thing happen? Mr. Bush was devastated himself, took it a while to sit in, but he was devastated.
2006-07-30 05:26:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by SecretUser 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
meteor. cause you can kill bush while you can't kill a meteor
2006-07-30 05:20:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by nuclearemperor 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
which of these is more dangerous a small fluffy cat or radical islam
what a slanted question.
2006-07-30 05:18:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
only IDIOTS...................and TERRORISTS........................ will say george w. bush
2006-07-30 05:19:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by zoo2626 4
·
0⤊
0⤋