English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I've played FF before, but this is my first time using the Yahoo one - I'm always fascinated by perspectives on teams, so just wondering what people think of mine:

1. (6) T. Barber RB
2. (15) M. Harrison WR
3. (26) T. Brady QB
4. (35) D. Davis RB
5. (46) K. Johnson WR
6. (55) A. Vinatieri K
7. (66) Carolina DEF
8. (75) J. Porter WR
9. (86) B. Watson TE
10. (95) J. Delhomme QB
11. (106) J. Jurevicius WR
12. (115) D. Akers K
13. (126) D. Rhodes RB
14. (135) M. Pollard TE
15. (146) Miami DEF

I can see weaknesses myself - I'd prefer stronger running backs, and I'm concerned about my No.3 WR, but overall, pretty happy. What do you think?

2006-07-30 03:56:12 · 7 answers · asked by lagunium 2 in Sports Fantasy Sports

7 answers

Assuming a 12 team league? I agree with your assessment, I see you got 2 top QB's which will have hidden value later on. Someone will be looking to trade for one of your QB's.
You could upgrade that TE position with a QB trade early in the season maybe before the season starts.

Your #3 WR and even your #2 WR could be a concern, I like Meshawn to have a decent season alongside Smith but with never can tell when a guy goes to a new team. Jurevicious could have a decent season but I doubt it will be as good as his best ever last yr.

If you get a chance and want to chat to a bunch of football crazy people check out:

www.FantasyFanBase.com

2006-07-30 04:08:08 · answer #1 · answered by fanbase 3 · 1 0

You don't need stronger RB's. YOU have 2 really good RB's. Barber is the 4th or 5th pick in most leagues, and Davis usually goes around 15 gettin him in the 4th is a steal. Dominic Rhodes is the starter for the best OFF in the league, and if he doesn't lose his job to Addai he'll go for about 1,000 and 7 or 8 TD's. I would worry about your 2nd WR. Keyshawn is well past his prime, and even in his prime he wasn't a great fantasy WR. I would make a trade that would include Rhodes, and Keyshawn to get you a better 2nd WR. Other than that your team looks good, you got a great backup QB, great kicker, and a great DEF. The one thing I would say is that you took Vinatieri WAY TOO EARLY. 6th round is entirely too early to take a kicker even if he's the best PK in the league. That is the only bad decision i see on your team. Overall I give you a

7.6/10

2006-07-30 05:57:15 · answer #2 · answered by Taylor C 3 · 0 0

You are insane taking two kickers period, let alone before a third RB. You took K. Johnson, Vinateri, Carolina and Ben Watson way too early.

Jurevicious and Maimi were good late picks. Your first four picks were great. K and DEF score few points, so even the best ones don't score a lot more than the bad ones. You should never take them until your final picks.

You definitely need another RB. Delhomme is a starting caliber QB, you should be able to get one for him.

2006-07-30 04:03:05 · answer #3 · answered by bulladawudz 3 · 0 0

I would agree that you need stronger running backs. Right now, I would start Jerevicius over Porter because Porter wants to be traded. I am expierenced with fantasy football, and I would draft only one kicker and only one defense. Sure, it is good to have a backup D, but it takes up room that you could use for another RB or WR.

2006-07-30 04:02:32 · answer #4 · answered by sportsfan89b 5 · 0 0

It's average..like someone pointed out, great first 4 picks.. but kicker and defense came way too early.. I'd be concerned about your number 2 and 3 wide receivers.. I'd say get rid of Akers and Miami.. add depth or work a trade if someone has a really weak kicker/D selection. I think to make playoffs is gonna be a fight for you..

2006-07-30 07:43:04 · answer #5 · answered by rychendroll 3 · 0 0

like it was suggested here trade one of your qb for a strong rb and yes, you need another wr.

2006-07-30 05:12:00 · answer #6 · answered by Rusty Shackleford 5 · 0 0

not bad, good defense, u can trade for stronger running backs

2006-07-30 04:02:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers