How many of you out there in Internet-land believe anyone in the Royal Family had anything to do with Princess

Question

Diana's death?
If not, why has the investigator of her death suddenly stepped down, due to "being too busy"?
Does anyone smell a rat?
Simon 2

Answer 1

I belive always have since it happend!

Answer 2

I don't know, but I believe the Royal Family did sort of snuff out Diana. She was a threat to their being. Although, I don't blame the Queen or members of the actual royal family. I blame advisors and people that have political powers and are somewhat inside the royal circle and acted on the idea without consulting members of the Royal Family themselves. I do find the whole thing rather suspicious, considering Diana wrote a note to Burrell saying that she believed she would die in a car accident and that someone was honestly out to get her. There is a lot of evidence to suggest it. Consider the fact that Trevor Reese-Jones was wearing a seatbelt. Bodyguards in any country rarely if ever wear seatbelts because they need to be ready to jump in the way of a bullet etc..that fact in itself is suspicious. Unless MI-6 or Scotland Yard tipped off Trevor saying that something bad might happen. Also, why has the driver of the white Fiat not come forward?He can't be convicted of anything, because he was driving normally. The mercedes that Diana was in was driving at a high rate of speed and swerved to miss the white fiat. Unless the white fiat did more than drive away before paparazzi and authorities arrived on the scene.

Answer 3

I don't think alot of people realize the power the British Royal Family has...They ARE Briton...Prince Philip could run someone over in front of 1000's of witnesses and nothing would happen. This is one family that is truly above the law. I'm Canadian, so I know the power, you can't kick them out like a government. If they say get rid of this one, or shut that one up,,,its done. Diana didn't shut up when asked, or told, or threatened. As for the car accident....yeah, aren't most murders made to look like an accident. I was watching CNN getting reports before she was even announced dead, and I kept thinking "they did it"...You don't go against the queen....Some of you who know some history may remember the story of Anastasia...the Russian princess who was supposed to have been murdered with her family. Do you know the British Royals were family, And they asked to be taken to London where they could be safe, and they were denied. -

As for the drunk Henri Paul...I guess we just have to take the word of the coroner...I'm sure he can't be influenced or paid off. The Royal Family is the head of the church of England....if Diana was pregnant, then that child would have been Muslim...can't have that!! King William, with a Muslim half brother or sister. Just couldn't risk it.

PS...anyone notice how quite Fergie got after that?????

Answer 4

1- the royal family have no day to day control over the appointment or actions of the royal coroner.
2- Neither do they have control over the intelligence services (who's activities have to be sanctioned by the PM if they're serious).
3- Anyone who suggests that British intelligence services operated in France to kill a member of the royal family has obviously taken leave of their senses.
4- The royal coroner didn't actually run the investigation - that was the Metropolitan Police's job. It was his job to rule on whether the cause of death was accidental or something else.
5- Anyone who can't face the facts that sometimes important people die in accidents would do well to look at the Munich air disaster, the death of Buddy Holly or Aliyah.
6- Most conspiracy theories arise when people fail to apply Occams razor - the simplest explanation is most often the most accurate. The theory that HMG ordered her death is on a par with aliens being involved in the assassination of JFK or Versace.

Answer 5

Here we go again, conspiracy theorists, more like piss artists!
What one believes and what can what can prove are two separate things. You may wish to believe that the late Diana, Princess of Wales (correct title) was murdered. You may wish to believe that the moon is made of cheese. I believe that it was a tragic accident. The "investigator" as you so naively put it was a Coroner ( an official in every district of the U.K. who presides over matters relating to death) had to request to be taken off the case due to the overwhelming pressures he was under from the press, world attention etc., he just was not accustomed to the amount of media pressure that this case has.
But no, this is of no interest, yet another twist in an unsolvable mystery. No rat, no conspiracy, just a tragic accident that happens daily.

Answer 6

Hi! Diana couldn't play the Royal Game - all she had to do was keep quite about Charles & Camilla and have all the money & privledge she could have dreamed of .. Everyone knew about C&C even Diana - but could you imagine what Charles children would have looked liked he he had them with Camilla..? Diana was Bonking everybody from the Butler to the Bodyguard to the Rugby player - there is even speculation that she bonked Mr Blobby...Do you reallly think the Establishment would allow her to continue flaunting with a Muslim whos father kept getting knocked back for a British Passport.. Ofcourse she was bumped off - !

Answer 7

Isn't it about time this was laid to rest. Diana died in an accident caused by a drunken driver and the fact that her and Fayed were not wearing seat belts. The bodyguard was and survived. Surely part of the 'conspiracy' could not have been to persuade Diana and Fayed NOT to wear their seat belts. If they had they'd have been alive today. If the car had contained 'ordinary' people the accident would have been long forgotten. Remember that sensational stories sell newspapers and they will keep this particular chestnut going for as long as people can be persuaded that here was some sort of 'conspiracy'.

Answer 8

Royalty has always had a way of doing away with those that the people could not let go of when it was unfavorable to the future's reigning power - they just used to be more civil about it - "off with her head" in a public square's guillotine! Few women will have ever had the grace and finesse of Princess Dianna and the public's heart. She would have been a Queen beyond measure - and that was the fear - her sons' would have respected her input and her influence and the powers that be saw that as a challenge that could not be left as an opposing force. Greed, once again, has been the murderer.

Answer 9

I'm sorry Bluebell, but what you say is not true: they always have! Just think about how wars started. I don't know much about history, but I know that once apon a time the royal familys were all related, the zar of Russia I do belive (not sure) was a cousin of Phillip. Anyway, personally I do think that they have something to do with it, but I suppose we will never know... I feel very sorry for Diana's sons, I hope they don't think the same as many of us...

Answer 10

Princess Diana died because she wasn't wearing a seatbelt when her car went into a concrete pillar at high speed.

Only one person in that car was wearing a seatbelt and he survived.

So are you suggesting that the Queen transmitted message using telepathy to stop her from putting her seatbelt on?

And if I was chief investigator I would quit because I'd be sick to death of all the questions about if it was a conspiracy or not. Especailly by people who think that if she was pregnant with Fayed's baby that the baby would be in line to the throne... which is ridiculous.

Answer 11

Hmmm - Well - I don't actually think that they had anything to do with it, BUT - Possibly departments connected with them might have..

I would like to point out that she wasn't the little angel that the tabloid press has created - She was quite a "Normal" woman - Which I'm sure most of the men here can imagine. Why else would Charles prefer an older "less attractive" woman unless she was "nicer"