You have to be a bloody fool to believe this piece of horsedung. The whole onslaught has been prepared well in advance as part of a wide scheme called New ME whereby Israel is to emerge as the master of the whole region.
2006-07-30 02:59:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chevalier 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
Listen.. Israel gave up some territory to Lebanon as part of the peace agreement. Hezbollah broke that agreement when they kidnapped these people, leaving all bets off the table.
Why should Israel give up ANYTHING more when Lebanon has ZERO control over these people who want nothing more than death and destruction to all Israelis?
Civilians on both sides are casualties of war, I'm afraid. Lebanon has to make the first move here and do something about the terroristic Hezbollah. Then, and only then they MIGHT be able to work things out.
2006-07-30 02:58:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by catwymn 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No it's not.
Israel, who's been planning this war for over a year, is using that as a reason to attack Lebanon.
If it really was about the two soldiers, they would have took Hezbollah's offer to trade soldiers and avoided all the killing of innocent civilians.
For your information, the morning of the kidnapping of the Israeli soldiers, Israel kidnapped some of Hezbollah's. Israel has thousand or Arab/Muslim soldiers and civilians in it's prisons. Soldiers are always kidnapped as POW EVERYWHERE, but no one reacts the way Israel reacted. It is not about the two soldiers! Open your eyes people!
2006-07-30 05:30:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Yaz 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course it's not a matter of 2 kidnapped soldiers! That was just the straw that broke the camels back. Israel finally said that they had had enough of Hezbollah's terrorism inside Israel, killing innocent men, women and children. It is terrible what the innocents on both sides are going through. However, Hezbollah has deliberately, with cowardice, placed it's rocket and missile launchers in residential neighborhoods. Hezbollah is using innocent men, women and children as human shields. The only way they know how to fight is to fight dirty. Well, now Israel has taken the fight to them.
2006-07-30 04:31:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by celticwoman777 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, that was just the last straw. As far as the innocent being killed in Lebanon, it was known Hezballah stored their munitions in the building they were in. How low is that? Hiding among the people. If it were to happen here, say rockets from Mexico city from a part of the government such as Hezballah is in Lebanon, into San Diego. Kidnapping of our border guards. What do you think we would do? Sit back?
2006-07-30 13:01:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rick 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If Hezbollah did not want a war, those soldiers would have been returned.
Lebanon wanted the war. Lebanon got the war.
And as far as the civilians, call them hostages and bullet shield of the dishonorable Lebanon army.
Do not want your kids shot at? Do not use them as bullet shields for you guns.
2006-07-30 03:17:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by lightning_bug_x 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
When will Muslims=Ismael and Jews=Issac reconcile?
They were both sons of Abraham!!!
Best Wishes and Good Fortune my friend
2006-07-30 03:07:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
hey hey hey.......you all forget one thing....... before hesbolla took that soilder, israel took more than 20 lebenese prisoners, when hesbolla took the soilder, he wanted to trade him with one lebense prisoner, but israel didnt want that and they used this as an excuse to attack lebenon,,,,,, and part of the plan is to pull iran in so that america can attack iran..... dont be stupid....... and as i have said before in other answers, if u r in america then dont answer these types of questions, because the american media all bull **** they only tell u and show u wat they want u 2 know .......
2006-07-30 03:06:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Matthew 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Convinced or Not, it is the cause for the present conflict.
2006-07-30 02:58:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Electric 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe the kidnapping was the catylist to dangerous cocktail.
2006-07-30 02:55:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋