English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

Psychologists call the language of the brain, 'mentalese'

"Suppose your long-term memory contains knowledge of the immediate families of you and everyone around you. The content of that knowledge is a set of propositions like "Alex is the father of Andrew." According to the computational theory of mind, that information is embodies in symbols: a collection of physical marks that correlate with the state of the world as it is captured in the propositions.

These symbols cannot be English words and sentences, notwithstanding the popular misconception that we think in our mother tongue. Sentences in a spoken language like English or Japanese are designed for vocal communication between impatient, intelligent social beings. They achieve brevity by leaving out any information that the listener can mentally fill in from the context. In contrast, the "language of thought" in which knowledge is couched can leave nothing to the imagination, because it -is- the imagination. Another problem with using English as the medium of knowledge is that English sentences can be ambiguous. When the serial killer Ted Bundy wins a stay of execution and the headline reads "Bundy Beats Date with Chair," we do a double-take because our mind assigns two meanings to the string of words. If one string of words in English can correspond to two meanings in the mind, meanings in the mind cannot be strings of words in English. Finally, sentences in a spoken language are cluttered with articles, prepositions, gender suffixes, and other grammatical boilerplate. They are needed to help get information from one head to another by way of the mouth and the ear, a slow channel, but they are not needed inside a single head where information can be transmitted directly by think bundles of neurons. So the statements in a knowledge system are not sentences in English but rather inscriptions in a richer language of thought, 'mentalese' . . . "

2006-07-29 22:19:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm thinking that the language that we think would be the language that we are used to.
But, the language of the brain/mind.....hmmm.....I wonder if it is different and it is just so influenced by what we are used to what ever language that we have grown up with.
That's a pretty big question to ponder. I don't think that too many people think of something so intense as that.
Thanks for making some brains get to thinking out here!

2006-07-29 21:23:24 · answer #2 · answered by oodlesoanimals 5 · 0 0

We think in the language we speak (at least we should). There is no language of the brain. It is just a bunch of signals.

2006-07-29 21:18:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Aunty, you arise with a few very fascinating questions. If one argues that language is an running process for the mind, and if one believes that language is tied to tradition, that's a robust motive to grasp one more language! I am no longer speakme right here approximately dabbling in Level one million or two or a moment language. I am speakme of the sustained attempt it takes to obtain close local skillability or above. One's mind then has 2 running methods, does it no longer? And as one has to emerge as completely conversant in one more tradition to attain that degree of mastery, 2 methods of watching on the global, i.e. 2 varieties of "Weltanschauungen". Our faculties, a minimum of the ones within the US in which we wait a ways too lengthy to start moment language guideline, would not have ample time to convey us to this degree of skillability, however it's feasible for a stimulated scholar to emerge as a stimulated student and to reap this degree in the course of top institution or put up-secondary years with a complete immersion enjoy as an trade scholar with a one-12 months or longer keep in a nation where the goal language is spoken. I do not know if I spoke for your query, however I continuously experience getting up on my soapbox encouraging younger individuals to be an trade scholar.

2016-08-28 15:42:46 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Humans are heavily influenced by their DNA's and the heridity of it.The thinking process is nothing but a complex action reaction nueral activity with added chemistry.However the interface that triggers ,analyses and processes the process is definitely influenced by once mother tongue.So people even in their subconcious are influenced by their language of origin.

hopw this answers your question.
If not lets wait for a better once.

Regards,
Kedar.

2006-07-29 21:20:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You think in the language that is your native language.

2006-07-29 21:15:36 · answer #6 · answered by roxya153 4 · 0 0

I dont think and had my brain surgically removed at birth to prevent me from thinking.

2006-07-30 01:28:11 · answer #7 · answered by betterbegood_to_me 2 · 0 0

brain is the main part of the organs that think every move we do

2006-07-29 21:42:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You think in the language(s) you speak, or that's how it works for me.

I'm learning German, and when I'm speaking German, I think in German. When speaking my native English, I think in English. Maybe that's just me.

2006-07-29 21:16:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Your question's already been answered. I just wanted to interject a question of my own.




How come the guy who calls himself "detective" is the only one who doesn't have a clue?




Get it?

2006-07-29 21:46:50 · answer #10 · answered by Goethe 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers