YES, in my backyard i have a dog called HEAVEN !!!.
2006-07-29 20:10:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by JAM123 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Hubble Space Telescope is the largest and most powerful telescope in the world, but NASA wants to build a telescope that will let astronomers (scientists that study the universe) see even further into the universe. This new telescope will be called the Next Generation Space Telescope, and although it will be much more powerful than the Hubble telescope, it will only be half as large.
2006-07-29 22:38:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by mspentinum 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It relies upon who you recommend with suggestions from "we". I frequently take this variety of question as meaning "everyone alive at present", in which case my answer can be a pessimistic "no". even if, it ought to represent our modern civilization(s), i.e., those who nonetheless remember what (and why) we are seeking. if so, my answer can be a diverse "perchance". My pessimism comes from the terrific situations I labored with the Drake equation (provides the "anticipated" variety of wise civilizations, able to interstellar verbal substitute" in keeping with galaxy). at the same time as it first got here out, optimists got here upon estimates of 10,000 -- even 100,000 -- civilizations in keeping with galaxy. even if, as time is going on and we see all that nature can throw at worlds to maintain away from existence from evolving properly, the numbers were taking position gradually. The very last time I appeared (admittedly, a lengthy time period lower back), the variety develop into all the way down to round 0.25 (= a million/4). rather of counting the anticipated variety of civilizations, we were counting the variety of galaxies that we may assume to scour, previously searching one such civilization. one element in the choose of the optimists: the anticipated variety of civilizations in keeping with galaxy obviously can't be 0 (we exist). hence it ought to be better than 0. So, that is conceivable that there is yet another civilization (or better) available. even if the question (and the spirit of the Drake equation) is: do we ever learn about "them"?
2016-11-26 23:17:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by lindgren 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, that is a world that is believed to be existing in the minds of the religious.
2006-07-29 20:10:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by schizophrenic 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The JWST will indeed be more powerful than the HST. It will also be considerably larger: the primary mirror will be ~6m compared to 2.4m for HST.
2006-07-31 16:38:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Heaven is not a physical place.
2006-07-29 20:04:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Like Glue 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Please ask science based questions on this site. Heaven is a religious concept that may or may not exist, it is certainly not in this physical existance
2006-07-29 20:18:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by andyoptic 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Silly question..
Heaven is not a physical place...
You knew that..
Why ask a silly question ?
2006-07-29 20:44:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its hubble space telescope.
2006-08-01 00:05:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Vedha 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
if it is really exists.
2006-07-29 20:22:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by happy_84 k 4
·
0⤊
0⤋