Yes, there are some credible sources that explain how those buildings actually went down.
This is a good time to be examining the collapse of the towers, because we are finally starting to get some cold hard evidence, that show us, how those buildings came down. Here is some of the most recent irrefutable evidence available today.
1. We now have eye witness accounts, from people inside of the building, telling of explosions taking place, on different floors, including lower floors, just before the buildings went down. Many of the witnesses, were silenced when the buildings collapsed, but their accounts live on, in just released radio recordings. (I'll try to find them on the Internet for you. I heard the firemens radio conversations, not to long ago.) They went something like this, "What's going on! I'm on the 22nd floor, and I just heard an explosion." "I'm on 72, and I heard one too."
2. Photographs of the buildings, just before it went down, show molten metal flowing out, from the building. Structural steel requires temperatures, well beyond burning jet fuel, to melt. Further, the color of the glowing molten metal, is also representative of high temperatures, beyond that of burning jet fuel. See source below, for detailed information, regarding structural steel melting points etc.
3. A chemical analysis of the molten metal, found at the site, shows traces of a chemical called, "Thermate". Thermate charges are used by professional demolition crews, to cut through steel beams, to demolish buildings. Incidentally, the samples were recovered by a member, of the clean up crew, who kept it as a souvenir memento. Most of the scrap metal, including the pools of molten steel, were recovered by a demolition crew, and discarded. There are though photos, at ground zero, showing beams that have been shearded at a right angle: Slag is shown dripping from the process. Click on photo, in website below; for a close up examination.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2842384983834100001
4. Thermate traces have also been found, inside the bodies, of those exposed to the gases from the molten debris; people such as firemen and clean up crew members.
I found the following video clip, while conducting research. It has a bias slant, but is also very intriguing. Once you see it, you'll never be able to see the 9-ll tragedy the same again: I know I won't.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1519312457137943386&q=loose+change
2006-08-01 13:24:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Joe_Pardy 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
properly, I even have in my opinion seen ufos (i became 11, so.. it ought to have been a airplane of a few variety.), and that i've got look some fishy activities relating 9/11.nonetheless, i might say aliens could be extra possible considering we do stay in an endless and ordinarily unexplored universe and because there have been many (in keeping with possibility interior the tens of millions) first hand debts of alien phenomenon throughout the completed international. Umm, i do unlike FOX, or CNN, or any of the main 24-hour information networks (i pass on line to get my information.). you could prepare the completed fox-calling-human beings-idiots situation to something. human beings have a tendency to call out those whose techniques variety from the norm. Yeah, i'm going to admit, i've got executed that myself. undergo in recommendations the Raelians? Buncha oddballs to me. yet in spite of, they are bizarre to me with the aid of fact their ideals are too bogus and farfetch in my head. i basically locate it troublesome to understand why they perception what they suspect. it basically does not upload up in my little bitty recommendations.
2016-11-03 07:14:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
you think that the US gov't asked the Muslims to kill innocent Americans?
I wouldn't even think president Clinton could do something like that, let alone Bush.
Clinton was/is a slimeball, but even he wouldn't do that.
so if he wouldn't, then you can bet your life Bush wouldn't.
2006-07-29 19:28:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Wayne A 5
·
0⤊
0⤋