English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

(Semitic people may also respond but NO FINGER-POINTING as to who threw the first punch or one too many, or so help me I'll thrash the both of you :)). Solutions only, please.

2006-07-29 18:24:38 · 21 answers · asked by .Yeshua Fanatik Prophetik. 1 in News & Events Current Events

21 answers

All the Arab states have to recognize the right of the State of Israel to exist...

Until then, there can be no lasting peace.

Simple, yet difficult...

2006-07-29 18:31:30 · answer #1 · answered by gibbs303 3 · 0 1

Define - Semitic ?


Sorry wandering offtopic here, but then again there is no solution so it's a moot point. I did love the recent comment by some moron from Hong Kong on World Have Your Say (BBC) that we need to relocate all the Israeli's. Let's see the most development country in the Mid-East in terms of infrastructure, I am sure they will hand it over on a UN mandate or anyone's mandate.


Anyways, All Arab and middle eastern peoples are Semitic, their language and history are intertwined.


check out : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic

2006-08-04 05:46:36 · answer #2 · answered by berkut 1 · 0 0

The Vietnam conflict replaced into specifically the persons battling North Vietnam to eliminate Communism in that area. South Vietnam necessary to reunite Vietnam under a democratic capitalist government. The Iraq conflict, inspite of the undeniable fact that on the subject material of squaddies from distinctive international locations, has been specifically American-led. removing a dictator in Iraq has became the country the quite a few way up as extremist communities attempt to realize ability and mistreat human beings of a distinctive ethnicity. the important assessment between those 2 is the shortcoming of generally happening help for the conflict, with the aid of fact the armies get slowed down into further and extra guerilla battling.

2016-11-03 07:09:46 · answer #3 · answered by ravelo 4 · 0 0

Solution: wow, you ask a lot. There will never be peace in the Middle East or anywhere else until people have peace in their hearts and put an end to the hate. If this could happen they could all live in all the M.E. countries together, practice their own religion and respect and tolerate each others differences.

Give a real solution and you'll get a Pulitzer Prize.

2006-08-06 11:31:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

1. Stop sending weapons to the middle east. I doesn't matter who's right or wrong, just get the firepower out.

2. Start talks on 3rd party, neutral ground. I don't think the US can deign this role at that at this time.

(3. ) Make the entire area a demilitarized zone like it is around contested religious sites. It will be land that belongs to everyone, so there will be nothing more to fight over.

2006-08-04 11:09:53 · answer #5 · answered by Jo B 2 · 1 0

Going on with the conflictt is the easy way and straight forward by most.

In truth, making difficult, unpleasant decisions for settlement by almost is avoided always. No one wants to admit to the mistakes, ask painful questions, or stop passing the problem to the third parties or the next generation, make the adjustment for a change, and
be pragmatic.

2006-08-05 23:00:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Religion and occupation of lands is part of the issue, unless the opposition recognizes Israel right to live there can be no resolve. If all parties recognizes Israel, the next step would be territory alignment which all parties involve would agree on without outside influence.

2006-08-04 14:10:20 · answer #7 · answered by shclapitz 3 · 0 0

Get the worlds most advanced economies to stop sending all their money over to the Middle East, like America give at least three billion a year to Israel. If you cut them off they might get a little less belligerent.

2006-07-29 18:35:18 · answer #8 · answered by zclifton2 6 · 0 0

Why don't the western countries just back out of the whole area, sell weapons to both sides, make tons of cash to pay for our health insurance, and deal with whoever wins the war?

2006-08-06 12:20:01 · answer #9 · answered by DB Cash 4 · 0 0

we should stay out of their business and let them do whatever it is they need to do.too many fingers in the pie too many people meddling where they should not be we dont understand fully what is happening there if everyone minded their own store the warringf would long be over and done with dont you agree? what business do we or anyone else have in the constant bickering and

2006-08-04 15:32:13 · answer #10 · answered by vanessa 6 · 0 0

Let 'em have at it, finish the fight instead of this half assed fight for awhile business and then broker a ceasefire. Nothing gets settled. the issue just simmers. Once Israel once and for all gives them a really good thrashing hopefully they will know their place.

2006-08-06 04:59:38 · answer #11 · answered by quikzip7 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers