does a bear **** in the woods, hell yea he did it!!!!
2006-07-29 15:55:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by cooter_brown872 2
·
2⤊
3⤋
Yes
2006-07-29 23:05:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Judas Rabbi 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh yeah. I knew he was guilty when they were chasing him in his Bronco. Everthing else, the evidence etc. just convinced me even more of his guilt. Cochrane turned this in to a race issue and it's a shame because the man really got away with murder. If that had been me in OJ's shoes, I'd be in prison or on death row!
2006-07-29 22:56:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by toughguy2 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. I think Cato or Simpson's son did it.
2006-07-29 22:59:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Randy H 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
He's sooooo guility it's not even funny. LAPD did such a lousy job, investigating the crime, they gave him at worst a hung-jury,at best an acquittal.
2006-07-29 22:58:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by tesorotx 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yep
2006-07-29 22:54:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by ♥ ☆ StarLiteGrl~98☼1 ☆ ♥ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, he did. I believe if all the evidence (blood/DNA) had been entered into evidence at trial instead of being lost, he would've been convicted.
2006-07-29 22:55:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by pvpd73127 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-07-29 22:56:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by crazi8red 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-07-29 22:54:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Me 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it was actually his older son that did it, OJ really didn't care about the itch. but his kids didn't like her attitude against their dad.
2006-07-29 23:21:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by myamoreterno 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is done and over with
the jury said no, so i say no
2006-07-29 22:56:02
·
answer #11
·
answered by bleacherbrat34 6
·
0⤊
0⤋