English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-29 15:51:15 · 17 answers · asked by Selena Jade's Mommy 4 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

17 answers

does a bear **** in the woods, hell yea he did it!!!!

2006-07-29 15:55:17 · answer #1 · answered by cooter_brown872 2 · 2 3

Yes

2006-07-29 23:05:20 · answer #2 · answered by Judas Rabbi 7 · 0 0

Oh yeah. I knew he was guilty when they were chasing him in his Bronco. Everthing else, the evidence etc. just convinced me even more of his guilt. Cochrane turned this in to a race issue and it's a shame because the man really got away with murder. If that had been me in OJ's shoes, I'd be in prison or on death row!

2006-07-29 22:56:45 · answer #3 · answered by toughguy2 7 · 0 0

No. I think Cato or Simpson's son did it.

2006-07-29 22:59:54 · answer #4 · answered by Randy H 2 · 0 0

He's sooooo guility it's not even funny. LAPD did such a lousy job, investigating the crime, they gave him at worst a hung-jury,at best an acquittal.

2006-07-29 22:58:34 · answer #5 · answered by tesorotx 5 · 0 0

Yep

2006-07-29 22:54:44 · answer #6 · answered by ♥ ☆ StarLiteGrl~98☼1 ☆ ♥ 7 · 0 0

Yes, he did. I believe if all the evidence (blood/DNA) had been entered into evidence at trial instead of being lost, he would've been convicted.

2006-07-29 22:55:38 · answer #7 · answered by pvpd73127 4 · 0 0

yes

2006-07-29 22:56:49 · answer #8 · answered by crazi8red 6 · 0 0

yes

2006-07-29 22:54:40 · answer #9 · answered by Me 6 · 0 0

No, it was actually his older son that did it, OJ really didn't care about the itch. but his kids didn't like her attitude against their dad.

2006-07-29 23:21:31 · answer #10 · answered by myamoreterno 3 · 0 0

it is done and over with
the jury said no, so i say no

2006-07-29 22:56:02 · answer #11 · answered by bleacherbrat34 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers