2006-07-29 15:15:53 · 40 answers · asked by laura g 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
No, why would you ask that?
2006-07-29 15:16:59 · answer #1 · answered by 120 IQ 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bill Clinton's only problems have been bad taste in his choice of women (Hillary, Monica, etc.) and being unable to keep "little bill" in his pants.
But no he is NOT gay.
2006-07-29 15:20:52 · answer #2 · answered by leehoustonjr@prodigy.net 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bill Clinton is gay and Ann Coulter is a man, how does that sound???????One thing Ann Coulter can do is sell books by denigrating people she doesn't like. She must have a really, really, really good lawyer, and I don't mean her, one that she has on retainer
2006-07-29 15:25:28 · answer #3 · answered by magpie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This coverage develop into "clintonian" in that it allowed human beings to do something unlawful as long as they did it sneaky. before each and every thing he wanted to make a coverage proper enable gay human beings to serve, even if the congress were given previous to him and made a regulation out of something that were a lengthy-status protection rigidity coverage. Clinton ought to substitute protection rigidity coverage, yet he ought to no longer substitute the regulation. even if coverage or regulation, it does make experience to ban gay human beings from serving. the justifications are spelled out in the regulation (link below), yet aren't any further pronounced a lot in at present's debate because, possibly... "Liberals do not care. Their mindset is to tear out society's foundations without asking in the adventure that they serve any purpose. Why do we've immigration guidelines? what's with those borders? Why do we've the agency of marriage, besides? What do we verify standardized checks for? whats up, i love Keith Richards -- why no longer make heroin criminal? enable's take a sledgehammer to maximum of those load-bearing walls and merely see what occurs! For liberals, gays in the protection rigidity is a win-win proposition. both gays in the protection rigidity works, or it wrecks the protection rigidity, both one among which consequences they enthusiastically help."
2016-11-26 22:59:53 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think his liking of women has been proven without a doubt. I like Mr. Clinton hes very intelligent except when it comes his hijinks's in the oval office closet.And No he certainly isnt "gay".
2006-07-29 15:22:06 · answer #5 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Isn't it amazing with all the problems in the world today, Ann Coulter would consider that something we need to worry about. She wasn't getting enough attention so she had to say something to shock people. She needed to sell more books!!!!!
2006-07-29 15:22:28 · answer #6 · answered by chi chi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you kidding? That's like asking if Heph is gay. Either one of those men can undo your bra just by thinking your name hard enough, little missy!
2006-07-29 15:17:35 · answer #7 · answered by nobody 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
The stain was in a Blue Dress, not a Blue Suit.
2006-07-29 15:18:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not gay, just a piece of **** communist that sold North Korea our nuclear secrets.
2006-07-29 15:20:12 · answer #9 · answered by Kyle B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are no signs of that unless you know more and then it was up to you to put your knowledge in the question.
Maybe then your question would be more than mind blowing stupidity.
2006-07-29 15:19:59 · answer #10 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He got head from Monica Lewinsky. I don't think he's gay.
2006-07-29 15:17:12 · answer #11 · answered by Pwnazorous 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋