You can't even spell the opposing veiwpoint name correctly. I cannot believe I have to share the same planet with people who actually read, and apparently believe, the crap you obviously got from the National Enquired or some rag of that type. You type fairly well for a chimp though.
2006-07-29 15:10:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Are you certain the 3,000 were on the streets of New York, or were they in Iraq? You can't have it both ways.
If you are referring to the those that lost their lives in the attacks on the World Trade Center, the previous administration is more culpable for that than the current one. It's been proven.
Just look at the events of the second term of Clinton's tenure and it is obvious. You don't decimate the CIA, make the mass reductions in the military that happened, drastically reduce expenditures on defense of this country through vetoes to most armament spending etc. etc. without expecting something bad to happen.
It was foolish foreign policy and dereliction of the most serious of responsibilities by the 'ever so loved' Bill Clinton that allowed those planes to bring down the Trade Center buildings.
2006-07-29 15:21:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because he has squashed all legitimate investigations of this event........The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Arlen Specter, has led the way in cleaning up the 9/11 Commission's unfinished business. Amid a very full plate of responsibilities, he conducted a hearing after noting that Col. Shaffer and Capt. Phillpott "appear to have credibility." Himself a former prosecutor, Mr. Specter noted: "If Mr. Atta and other 9/11 terrorists were identified before the attacks, it would be a very serious breach not to have that information passed along . . . we ought to get to the bottom of it."
You bet your *** we should. And I trust nobody more than Arlen Specter of getting it done right. I hope he calls the 9/11 Commission in to testify as witnesses. I'd LOVE to know why Able Danger's information was NOT HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT.
2006-07-29 15:12:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by tough as hell 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably because Hillary was the one really behind it. After all, don't you remember how bitter she looked when President Bush and Rudy Guilliani were getting so much support. If her plan had come together just a few months earlier, she could have been the STAR of 9/11!
2006-07-29 15:09:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by tsopolly 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You should choose a different country to reside in. You do not deserve the right to free speech.
2006-07-29 15:08:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by darleyjr 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I saw Santa Clause today.
2006-07-29 15:09:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
For a second there, I thought "tough as hell" was the most repulsive left-winger here!
2006-07-29 15:08:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Seriously man, if you are trying to disrespect someone, at least learn to spell the moniker first. RETARD!!!!
2006-07-29 15:14:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why do you repeat your questions twice? I'd be plenty embarrassed the first time if I were you...
2006-07-29 15:10:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by loubean 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why aren't you in an asylum for being mentally retarded.
2006-07-29 15:14:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by shektbg 2
·
0⤊
0⤋