because when some people have no reply to something, and feel threatened by that fact, the first reaction is to attack. Its unfortuante, but true.
2006-07-29 14:59:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by samina 3
·
1⤊
4⤋
You got 8 responses to "Why not ask?" (which listed 30 separate Qs) There were no real attacks. The closest was this answer.
"I tried to answer these one by one. These are too ridiculous to waste my time. You are obviously a person of little intelligence, so go ahead and believe what you want. I got to #13 and decided it wasn't worth my time."
Somewhat insulting, but not quite an attack.
You got 9 responses to "Please ask until ..." (This one listed 34 separate Qs!) Some were a rather sarcastic ("if all the above is true, the earth must be flat, too") but far from attacking.
You must have been so disappointed that you didn't get the response you wanted. (You were apparently hoping to draw the rabid element of the conservatives out, rather than hoping for legitimate answers) But that didn't stop you from claiming "personal or meaningless attacks."
If thats the case; Shame on you on both accounts! That type is no better than Anne Coulter. I watch her in interviews & it's obvious she is more interested in driving liberals bonkers than actually having any meaningful discussion. This attitude on the LEFT & RIGHT is further dividing our great nation!
2006-07-30 05:08:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Smart Kat 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well, I'm not a right-winger, nor am I familiar with your questions, but I'm guessing it's because the questions are absurd and inane.
The conspiracy theory questions are pointless. Not only are they almost assuredly wrong, but they have no bearing on reality. Let's assume that 9/11 was some giant hoax. Where do we go from there? No one will listen to you. You'll die on your soapbox.
So it doesn't really matter. The current situation is what the current situation is. And it must be dealt with as is--and whether or not 9/11 was a hoax or not is immaterial. So let it lie already.
2006-07-29 14:59:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Because many of your questions look like this:
Do uniformed people who vote for a tyrant hurt our Democracy?
Should President Bush answer to the American people?
Does this sound like todays republicans?
Is it unpatriotic to accept lies from the president?
Have you forgotten?
Bush's lies were used as a justification for launching an invasion and occupation of Iraq which has killed hundreds of U.S. soldiers and thousands of Iraqis and which has and will cost the U.S. taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars (far better spent on health, education and unemployment benefits for the workers whose jobs Bush has shipped overseas). The long-term damage to America is incalculable. Bush's lies amount to a "high crime" under the U.S. Constitution and justify impeachement and removal from office.
Is being rich and greedy the main prerequisite for being a republican?
Is it ok to lie to the American people to start a war?
and to award no bid contracts to political friends? Where the hell are the heroes in congress on this ? ....the American people are being raped........and even more sickening the religious right applauds it
When will you idiots read the true history of the Mideast and the U.S. and British involvement ?
Many of you think you have a (fox) or (republican)quickie answer for my questions, sadly these are not answers they are devoid of reality.....please research
Anyone making under a $100.000 a year and still votes republican is politically retarded right?
why is Bush such a lying piece of !@#$ ?
Would YOU want to answer you? It's pretty obvious that your mind is made up.
2006-07-29 15:01:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Oh, I see, it became all bill Clinton's fault, no longer the guy who became president for 8 months best as much as 9/11, no longer the guy who won a memo entitled "Osama Bin weighted down desperate to attack the U. S." a month till now 9/11 and did no longer something up till ultimately that element different than pass on holiday. no longer a president who truly deliberate on reducing counter terrorism investment. no longer a commander-in-chief who wasted maximum of his protection stress components enticing in conflict that had no longer something to do with 9/11 justified by lies. no longer the president who while asked approximately Osama Bin weighted down, suggested he wasn't even worried approximately him or spent any time questioning on the subject of the subject. And if we will blame previous presidents, it became decrease than Reagan that the CIA knowledgeable a majority of the Taliban interior the 1st place, and it became Reagan who left Afghanistan a multitude and liable to extremists. yet no, this is all Clinton's fault, precise?
2016-10-01 06:02:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Look man. I read your question. If you would phrase your questions based on true fact and not on the fictitious claims made in Farenheight 9/11, you may get better answers. When right wingers read rhetoric, they get pissed. Just as left wingers do. Phrase logical, fact-based questions and you will get logical answers.
2006-07-29 15:10:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by shektbg 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
I went back through your questions and I don't see a one about 9/11; meaningful that is.
2006-07-29 14:58:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Iron Rider 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Your question wasn't meaningful, it was conspiratorial...and lacked any legitimate facts. Come up with a good theory, and I'll be interested.
And, how do you know I'm a right winger...is it my severe hair and business suit...aww shucks.
2006-07-29 14:58:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by loubean 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Try not to be biased, and propose your ideas in a meaningful, direct, and professional way. That way, more people will answer in a better tone. Also, try to ignore the attacks.
2006-07-29 14:58:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Perhaps you should profer you question in a neutral tone so as not to incur baised responses. Asking a question like "How come all you ********* are *******?" is a great way to get your question rammed up your #$$. When asking a question, ask yourself first: Is the slap I'm going to give worth the slap I'm going to get. Give it a try.
2006-07-29 15:01:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by rico3151 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Your questions can not be answered by any of us: WE DO NOT KNOW!!. You need solid proof for a conspiracy theory to hold. All else is nothing but circumstances even if true...
2006-07-29 15:12:42
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋