Should the world have a one child rule like china?

Question

for every desease is a cure unless we allow are natural resources to disappear.just because we want to give birth to 10 kids instead of adopting.

Answer 1

I would like a no child rule for 20 years then have 1 year every 10 that children are permissible.

Anyone caught having sex on the non child bearing years would be killed.

Go big Red Go

Answer 2

Oh girl, do you really want to watch people trying to argue for government-mandated abortions, given how difficult it is to even get the government to permit voluntary abortions?

Those who value personal liberties aren't going to support government-enforced mandatory abortions. It violates the basic principle of freedom of choice.

So, the only people who could possibly argue for government-prohibited pregnancy are the people who are anti-choice and believe that the government should be making all reproductive decisions.

Aside from the legal chaos that would result in the attempt, it's ultimately a pointless exercise. The resource limitations that we face are artificial, imposed by a market economy that wants price regulation. We've had the technology to end world hunger and energy and housing problems for most of a decade. We're just not using it.

So, limiting the population because we aren't currently generating the necessary resources is like burning down a supposedly inaccessible part of your house because you can't be bothered to open up the door to it.

Answer 3

Who's to say that one of those 10 kids a person gives birth to won't be the one to find a cure for AIDS? Our natural resources aren't disappearing because of how many children people have ... it's all because we haven't developed a better way to use and conserve them more wisely.

Answer 4

Actually, a lot of nations are experiencing population stability (procreation has stabilised to sustain the current population in the United States). And, in the case of Western Europe there is actually a population crisis where current numbers can not be sustained due to population attrition. The problem we encounter currently is that in developing nations where it is more difficult to sustain a population (let alone grow one) we find that population booming is evident. Per Density India has the greatest population growth which does not seem sustainable at current rates. Population growth is not a general discussion, but a specific one based on local data.

Answer 5

i imagine, no i recognize (quite from readin a number of those solutions) that there are alot of ignorant, hateful, racist, human beings in the international...and with that stated all of them have a properly to their opinion and to their lives...yet i do not trust those who can't preserve the youngsters they have b allowed to have better...if u have a million baby it really is lower than nourished, unloved, and uneducated don't have better...same is going to if u already have 6 interior of an identical condition. Now if u have the time, money, and different supplies to grant a sturdy sturdy, lovin surroundings for a baby..then have as many as u choose...i myself have 3 and that i choose yet another and plan on adopting...yet i'm also married, and characteristic my own company... And why the hell ought to u have abortions to save the earth from bein over populated...strap on a rattling condom or get on the pill...or get a vasectomy....abortion, what an fool!!!!

Answer 6

The one child rule isn't even working in China.

The problem is that the concept is flawed from the beginning.

To cut a very long explanation short, you end up with a 'very' ageing population and 'very' small young population to support it. It ends up that you have most of your population too old to work and support themselves.

Answer 7

I have another idea! lets outlaw "harmful" speech! monitor all civilians "for their protection" of course, and force all people to join "a one world religion" then if we took the money away from the rich and gave it to the poor....then everyone would be equal and peace would reign throughout the earth! But we'd better hurry GLOBAL WARMING IS COMING!

Answer 8

Yes.
6,000,000,000 humans on the planet is ridiculous.

Answer 9

Only if you cant take care of them, if you can take care of ten kids, go for it, but you shouldnt be having any if you cant take care of them.

Answer 10

nope. the one child rule is stupid.


p.s. 43 is an idiot.