Do these morons not understand we have an all volunteer military with young patriots that belive in the cause of the war against terror, and WANT to fight it? Why dont they all go to Iraq and fight against us seeing they HATE AMERCIA so much?
2006-07-29
09:39:23
·
22 answers
·
asked by
Simms
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
middlefinger, he is not sacraficing anyone you moron.People enlist on thier own, thats my point.God I hate stupid Liberals that dont understand easy questions
2006-07-29
09:45:54 ·
update #1
You are all just like your candidates that run for office, YOU DONT ANSWER THE QUESTION!!!
2006-07-29
09:47:55 ·
update #2
And Hillary has voted for it repeatedly Taffi..Libs keep forgetting that to this day, she supports the war
2006-07-29
09:52:47 ·
update #3
My dad did 3 tours of nam april,..you are wrong..
2006-07-29
09:57:58 ·
update #4
Thanks for the offer daniel c, but unlike you, i am NOT a GAY LIBERAL...Go find some other man to f you gay boy
2006-07-29
11:39:39 ·
update #5
I went over to the Persian Gulf as a US Marine Corps for Desert Storm. My parents did not send me. I volunteered to go into the Marines on my own. Most of friends laughed at me. I loved it. Michael Moore often corners different politicians--actually I remember him asking O'Reilly "Would you send your son to fight in Iraq?'. This has been a Democratic theme song. No one sends their children to Iraq. We go their because we chose to join the armed forces. I don't think people fight against Bush and the war because they hate America. They just love themselves. Self righteousness is such a wonderful cause for them. However, it offers no plan or way of dealing with the Islamic fanaticism that we see today. I'm sure there were lots of anti-war protesters in this country as Hitler rolled his tanks through Europe. However, strong courageous men and woman of the US got the job done despite the differences of opinion. People can be sincere in their opinions. But that doesn't make all opinions equal or right. I am thankful that we have a tough President that doing what in necessary over in the middle east.
2006-07-29 10:04:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by khcs89120 2
·
3⤊
2⤋
Yes the Liberals do hate America but forgetting that the Military is Voluntary or wanting to lie to the Public about that is about the only thing the Democrats can think of in their case against War (even though loads of flip flopping Democrats like John Kerry voted for us to go to War in the 1st place then claimed to be against what they voted for).
If we shouldn't send Soldiers into War then does that mean we should not send Police out to catch Criminals or Firefighters out to fight Fires?
My Dad use to be a Firefighter and while I thank God he never got killed in a Fire (I think he was injured in one before at least once though, I don't remember for sure), a Firefighter knows what could happen though.
My Dad has in fact been to Funerals of Firefighters killed in a Fire.
A Cop knows he/she could be killed while chasing Criminals yet there are people who do the job anyways.
When will the Liberals get a hint that there are people who are willing to die if they must, I would join the Military myself but im Medically disqualified from doing so.
2006-07-29 09:50:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by MrCool1978 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because they lost 2 elections. They feel their words will have impact. The liberals are not high on the Military anyway. And Hillary is right out in front of that parade. This is just all politics. They are only saying they support the military to hopefully get votes, but historically they vote down all pay increases and funding for the military.
2006-07-29 09:46:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since when does the president of the United States single handedly send our soldiers into combat? Any person over the age of ten should know that Congress (Liberals included) approved the deployment of troops. Every time I get on this site and see Americans (who should know better) complaining that Bush did this or Bush did that, it makes me want to weep for the future of our country. Are you really all that ignorant? That stupid? Bush can do NOTHING without permission from Congress......Oh, and don't give me the "He lied to us" story. That's just the Liberals trying to make excuses for voting to send troops to Iraq in the first place. It's a cop-out.
Pardon my rant, it's just that reading some of the responses from these fools annoys me to no end!
2006-07-29 09:50:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Taffi 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary is a traitor, and I've detested her since she has allowed her quest for power to overcome her dedication to protecting and defending the Constitution and serving the American People.
I know that all members of the military volunteered on their own free will, but that is not what we "ignorant liberals" are bitching about. We are angry because BOOsh betrayed the trust of the American people and has done a disservice to those that have volunteered for the military (for their many diverse reasons) in his quest for glory, world empire and to satisfy his endless greed.
He has killed our loved ones with his lies, because these people join to defend this nation, and that very dedication is being misused by this bastard.
If I hated America, I would encourage BOOsh to keep up the "good work". So f**k you buddy. I'm tired of you moronic Neo-Cons claiming that you love our soldiers when you are so willing to support the bastards that cut their veterans benefits, cut their pay, keep them on the frontlines longer than they agreed to and continuisly send them on missions that merely boost their own selfish image.
So, again, I say...f**k you.
2006-07-29 11:30:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Daniel C 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Even better is thr fact that the same liberal politicians who decry the war and call Bush a liar for WMD statements are on record supporting both the unilateral action to oust Saddam and the existance of WMD's Funny how they would believe Clinton, a proven liar, but not Bush.
2006-07-29 09:45:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by xtowgrunt 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The economic disaster of 2008 develop into 14 years in the making. Bush had 8 years to renounce it (the caution signs and indicators were obviously glaring a minimum of as early as 2001) yet did no longer something. The Republican's who managed from 1994-2006 did no longer something both. there develop into danger to maintain away from all of this. It develop into no longer taken. at the same time as there develop into countless cowardice on both aspect of the aisle i do not see how Bush ought to correctly be held innocent.
2016-11-26 22:32:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by albaugh 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's the liberal way...spend 2-3 days affixing blame to a subject, and then move on to the next subject. They can't spend more time on a subject because it soon becomes apparant they know not of what they speak...Ever hear more than a couple of slanderous remarks out of Nancy Pelosi on any subject ????
If you look above "APRIL" is a fine example...My buddies enlisted in a wing of the war machine...How dare George Bush use them to fight...."hhmmph"
2006-07-29 09:59:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by rochelle_hall2000 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Great question dude! The damnocrats never have solutions for anything and always blame Republicans for their own downfalls. By the way when will the idiot libs start taking personal responsibility for their own actions i.e. killing of millions of unborn children in the name of "rights". Keep up the good work dude and don't worry a damnocrat can't answer your question, because they have people like us to blame.
2006-07-29 09:47:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's not just Liberals. The rest of the thinking world, including governments now deplore Bush and Israel for their actions. Listen to British Foreign Secretary Straw. Diplomatically, he says, Israel has gone over the brink.
2006-07-29 09:56:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Blessed 1
·
0⤊
0⤋