English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

Honestly you should have known that the movie never ever is better than the book

2006-07-29 09:34:14 · answer #1 · answered by Zaurel 3 · 0 0

It was the last five minutes when Langdon said all of that sentimental stuff.....I hated that!!! It was out of character and context. The fact that they definitely said Sophie was the decendent was stupid, the fact that they found the tomb annoyed me, the fact that there was no family reunion and that she was only adopted really got me. The book was WONDERFUL!! but this film could have been so much better.

2006-07-29 16:34:41 · answer #2 · answered by silenthavens 2 · 0 0

I was disappointed that the movie didn't follow the book as completely as I would have hoped. The book was so good, why tamper with something that was written that well.

2006-07-29 16:34:32 · answer #3 · answered by Gemini 2 · 0 0

I agree. I, too, really enjoyed the book. The movie?? Nope.

2006-07-29 16:34:51 · answer #4 · answered by luckistrike 6 · 0 0

the movie was entertaining enough, but I really expected more. in no way did it live up to the book.

2006-07-30 05:47:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yea, the movie sucked but that was to be expected. they didn't even include the 2nd cryptex!!

2006-07-29 16:53:29 · answer #6 · answered by avatard 2 · 0 0

that's the way it is . take harry potter for instance,they skipped my favorite part!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!in #4

2006-07-29 16:59:34 · answer #7 · answered by i love roseanne!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1 · 0 0

never seen them

2006-07-29 16:37:41 · answer #8 · answered by yukmouth 6 · 0 0

THEY BOTH S U C K E D!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2006-07-29 16:34:04 · answer #9 · answered by bobby-bob 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers