this library lacks sufficient movies
makes more sense..
2006-08-05 15:25:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by wollemi_pine_writer 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
It doesn't make sense at all. Perhaps what you meant to say was "This library lacks a section (of books) on movies." Or,
" This library lacks in it's selection of movies."
2006-08-02 22:33:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by VelvetRose 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm afraid not - you would be better with either, "this library is lacking in movies" or "this library is badly supplied with movies".
Both mean that the library has too few movies.
2006-07-29 09:23:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by UKJess 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, that's incorrect. You could say that the library is lacking in movies, or that it's movie selection is lacking.
2006-08-03 15:27:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It meant the library needs more movie titles.
2006-08-05 00:18:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by john j 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think I know what you mean, so I guess it does make sense, but it is poorly stated. I think you mean the library's movie collection has a limited range of selection.
2006-07-29 15:18:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It means that the books on that certain library doesn't have much movies.
2006-08-04 22:28:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lacks is not followed by 'on' but by 'of' to mean, DEARTH, SHORTAGE, Because of not enough.
This library runs short of movies, movie-cassettes, DVDs / CVDs.
You can very well say,
'This library lacks movies.
Never, 'lacks on'!
2006-08-05 09:40:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Perhaps you meam this library is lacking movies.
2006-08-02 14:40:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
"this library stacks on its movies" would make more sense.
2006-08-01 19:15:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by GoingNoWhereFast 5
·
0⤊
0⤋