English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

this library lacks sufficient movies

makes more sense..

2006-08-05 15:25:52 · answer #1 · answered by wollemi_pine_writer 6 · 1 0

It doesn't make sense at all. Perhaps what you meant to say was "This library lacks a section (of books) on movies." Or,
" This library lacks in it's selection of movies."

2006-08-02 22:33:29 · answer #2 · answered by VelvetRose 7 · 0 0

I'm afraid not - you would be better with either, "this library is lacking in movies" or "this library is badly supplied with movies".

Both mean that the library has too few movies.

2006-07-29 09:23:47 · answer #3 · answered by UKJess 4 · 0 0

No, that's incorrect. You could say that the library is lacking in movies, or that it's movie selection is lacking.

2006-08-03 15:27:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It meant the library needs more movie titles.

2006-08-05 00:18:32 · answer #5 · answered by john j 2 · 0 0

I think I know what you mean, so I guess it does make sense, but it is poorly stated. I think you mean the library's movie collection has a limited range of selection.

2006-07-29 15:18:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It means that the books on that certain library doesn't have much movies.

2006-08-04 22:28:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Lacks is not followed by 'on' but by 'of' to mean, DEARTH, SHORTAGE, Because of not enough.

This library runs short of movies, movie-cassettes, DVDs / CVDs.

You can very well say,

'This library lacks movies.

Never, 'lacks on'!

2006-08-05 09:40:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Perhaps you meam this library is lacking movies.

2006-08-02 14:40:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

"this library stacks on its movies" would make more sense.

2006-08-01 19:15:48 · answer #10 · answered by GoingNoWhereFast 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers