English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If you think about it, it kinda does.

2006-07-29 07:39:47 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

9 answers

I agree with ggarsk: that the corporations that help import and hire them support illegal immigration.

I have seen privately owned companies (one was a college dormitory) that employed illegal immigrants and "paid" them off the books. Basically, they promise to protect them from deportation if they work for them. Some pay below minimum wage for this "favor." The privately owned dorm simply paid them in food from the cafeteria, with no monetary wages.

If you want to crack down on illegal immigration, then you need to crack down on the rich... hard! In my opinion, these practices are not only illegal, but highly unethical. I'm afraid if many of the wealthy business owners in this country had their way, we'd have indentured servitude and possibly slavery all over again.

2006-07-29 07:53:11 · answer #1 · answered by Alex 2 · 3 0

I'm not sure support is the word I'd use, but minimum wage certainly attracts them. A lot of illegals wind up working for out fits that, knowing their illegals, wont pay minimum wage. However, compared to what they have back home, whatever they get looks like executive wages.

2006-07-29 07:49:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A lot of illegals will work for less than minimum wage. Companies will hire illegals to work cheaper than Americans will. It's kind of like taking American companies out of the USA to places like China. It decreases the amount they pay in wages and benefits and increases their profit, which is what it is all about.

2006-07-29 07:47:44 · answer #3 · answered by The Nana of Nana's 7 · 0 0

NO!!! The bottom-line Corporations do and they don't pay minimum wage to illegals, they pay below minimum wages to them.

2006-07-29 09:41:53 · answer #4 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0 0

illegal immigration make minimum wage irrelevant

2006-07-29 07:44:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

helping unlawful immigration is the comparable as helping Slavery. i've got been pointing out this for months, i'm happy somebody else finally takes a glance down the line & can see the prospect of severe harm to the lives of the two illegals and individuals. Now ask, "what political occasion freed slaves and what political occasion did slave vendors belong to? "What exchange into the "financial" reason, Slave vendors used, as an excuse for Slavery?" They mandatory much less high priced slave hard artwork inorder to maintain the fee of cotton, low. what's a recuring subject Democrats voice as a reason the U. S. desires the illegals... "they're doing the roles individuals won't do(bullshitz, Am-Mex babies born listed right here are doing those jobs too, they're individuals). extra importantly, Democrats unfold the phobia of $20 fruit, illegals shop the fee of fruit low, in basic terms with the aid of fact the slaves saved cotton expenses low. making a $1mil/year in 2006, exchange into like making $a hundred,000 a year in 1806. Making $7hr in 2006, had to be damn close to to creating $0hr in 1806. Farms are the recent plantations, unlawful immigrants-their babies-and grandkids, stands out as the recent Slaves, right here to do the low experienced jobs. Blacks and Whites have not totally healed from our u . s .'s historic past, even although none persons have been around for the period of slavery, we've not any selection yet to handle it. we are in a position to make existence in u . s . a . of america extra effectual or we are in a position to make it worse. Giving amnesty to illegals, with the aid of fact some unlawful-mexicans artwork stressful, would be devistating to race family members in u . s . a . of america. there's a becoming resentment in the yank-Mexican babies born right here. whilst Democrats say "illegals are doing the roles individuals won't do", they're asserting a million of two issues to those babies doing "those jobs", this is the two, "we don't evaluate you(american-mexican) individuals" or worse "illegals are doing the roles "white" individuals won't do." Making them bypass lower back to Mexico sucks, despite if it may be the main suitable element for them. think of 12 million unlawful-mexicans returning to Mexico, taking the political expertise discovered right here and making some actual differences in the Mexican government. that could definitely be some thing Mexicans ought to expose satisfaction in.

2016-10-08 11:26:44 · answer #6 · answered by elidia 4 · 0 0

I would suggest reading a good article on immigration, titled "Immigration Has Different Impacts". You can view it at:

http://www.sandiegolawyerforyou.com/san-diego-immigration-lawyer.htm
http://www.san-francisco-oakland-bay-area-lawyers-attorneys-directory.com/
http://www.sacramento-ca-lawyers-attorneys-directory.com/articles.html
http://www.la-orange-county-lawyers-attorney-directory.com/los_angeles_orange-county-legal-services.htm
http://www.dallas-fort-worth-texas-lawyers-attorneys-directory.com/dallas-legal-services.htm
http://legal-advice-library.info/blog
http://www.san-antonio-texas-lawyers-attorneys-directory.com

http://www.las-vegas-nevada-lawyer-attorney-legal-injury-defense-directory.com

2006-07-30 03:51:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, Corporations hiring them do!

2006-07-29 07:44:11 · answer #8 · answered by ggarsk 3 · 0 0

employers do

2006-07-29 07:52:30 · answer #9 · answered by tmhdmh7 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers