....Yet the right to party is alienable, and must be fought for?
2006-07-29 06:31:23 · 14 answers · asked by kamkurtz 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because your pops caught you smokin and he said NO WAY!
That hypocrite smokes two packs a day
Your mom came home and said What's that Noise?
Aw Mom your just jealous it's the Beastie Boy!
You gotta fight
For your right
To party!
2006-07-29 06:35:59 · answer #1 · answered by Charles D 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Read your history:
IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. —
Yes, our founding fathers made a mistake: unalienable should be inalienable
2006-08-02 23:04:02 · answer #2 · answered by Eldude 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You do not have a "right to party". Nor is there a right to property. People who own property have various ownership rights, but the individual has no "right to property". I believe you are referring to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
2006-08-05 10:00:44 · answer #3 · answered by JAMES11A 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you are missing the point. That should be Life, Liberty and the Prosciutto of Happiness.
So Go out and find a Happy pig and you will have your prosciutto and whatever comes with it, including whatever property you feel you deserve..
2006-08-05 13:34:18 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. Been there 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
cases have replaced on account that Thomas Jefferson. The term "All adult men are created equivalent" exchange into no longer meant for Africans the two. It exchange into later accompanied via Martin Luther King Jr. to declare equality on account that they have been scuffling with against segregation. stop being so entitled. An unfeeling fetus or embryo has no rights. i'm guffawing at Adino the Enite for his contrite comments as data. The shape exchange into no longer written for the way forward for the African slaves to be freed at a later date. the place do you get your history? Thomas Jefferson did no longer prefer to loose his slaves. i'm extraordinarily specific that maximum slave vendors quite did no longer prefer to enable circulate of their loose hard artwork. Why could they? the place is your justification of that? Even Abraham Lincoln did no longer abolish slavery because of the fact it exchange into "incorrect". Duh.
2016-11-03 06:22:01 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mom, your just jealous it's the BEA-STIE-BOYS!
But seriously, it is alienable, notice how theres a drinking age, drugs are illegal, and if you play music cops will come and say your disturbing the peace... None of these things should be true but they are.
2006-07-29 07:58:01 · answer #6 · answered by RATM 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No where does it say anything about Property. The pursuit of happiness is. The attainment is not.
2006-08-04 15:14:11 · answer #7 · answered by viablerenewables 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the right to party couldn't exist if you weren't guaranteed life and freedom.
2006-07-29 06:35:24 · answer #8 · answered by Steven B 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you are fighting to party...your at the wrong Party!!!
If your fighting to party...you are probably partying at the wrong place...ie. do it with friends at their house where no cops are around...save you a DUI and spend the night is a good idea.!!! :P)
2006-08-05 14:38:20 · answer #9 · answered by Rada S 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Leave It God, God is the great Equalizer, he will take all that's wrong with the world off your shoulders, if you just release your burden to him.
2006-08-04 09:14:46 · answer #10 · answered by Candi H 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋