2006-07-29 06:29:05 · 5 answers · asked by martini_kiss81 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
The lines are starting to get blurred a little between the two, but in general, I'd probably say "yes". I don't necessarily need to see the biggest stars in Hollywood, and I definitely don't need the best special effects. I mostly enjoy great human drama founded upon intelligent writing, and skillful direction and acting. Often, an "indie": film is more likely to deliver the goods.
2006-07-29 06:38:10 · answer #1 · answered by Da Whispering Genius 4 · 10⤊ 2⤋
Yup, I do. I have found that indie films are usually more original and more interested than regular films. At least they are something different from the hum drum that is hollywood.
2006-07-29 06:40:57 · answer #2 · answered by Rawrrrr 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not really, but I like both to be honest. Indie films just allow for less effects to hide behind, so therefore you have to make a much better film for people to take notice.
2006-07-29 06:57:41 · answer #3 · answered by Vinyleyes 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, they're usually more interesting. And if they suck at least it didn't cost 400 million dollars...
2006-07-29 06:32:23 · answer #4 · answered by Charles D 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2006-07-29 06:31:53 · answer #5 · answered by friday13 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋