2006-07-29 03:34:48 · 15 answers · asked by iiiiiiiiiiiiii 2 in Beauty & Style ➔ Skin & Body
Created or enhanced for the most part, some have a great shape to their face but the makeup over the years has messed up their skin tone.
Tyra Banks is one that is for sure, she has white or lighter spots all over her face.
2006-07-31 00:37:23 · answer #1 · answered by Steve 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Cosmetically created. If you saw a female movie star without makeup on, you probably would not recognize them.
2006-07-29 10:38:41 · answer #2 · answered by skooter 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good question! Most of the time, such stunning beauty is made possible by an army of fashion stylists, make-up and hair experts, etc. However, the allure won't hold unless the star has impeccable poise, innate talent (for acting or generating tabloid buzz) and the X-factor to boot. Paris Hilton and Bai Ling are just inferior products compared to Nicole Kidman and Zhang Ziyi!!!
2006-07-29 10:43:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are fake. A lot of them may be pretty but not near as beautiful as you see them in mag ads and movies. It is called air brushing and most of the time they are cosmetically created
2006-07-29 10:40:40 · answer #4 · answered by loverbird20032003 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In magazines, photoshoots, publicity sorts of things, you have to take into consideration that literally hundreds of photos were taken and that you only see about twenty of the absolute best shots.
The other reason is that for ads and magzine interviews as well as movies, you can pretty much bet on a lot of heavy makeup being applied to every person (to reduce camera glare, to even out skin tone, to mask imperfections). For any day of the week, they have stylists and makeup and hair artists who keep them looking top-notch.
Most movie stars are traditionally naturally attractive, either out of bone structure or the balance and symmetry of their features (the things psychologists say trigger our perception of attractiveness), but they aren't the picture-perfect specimens that we all see day to day.
For more candid shots, you can count on the tabloids, of course.
2006-07-29 10:42:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't think they are cosmetically created...think about it. They have the jobs mostly because of their looks. They have to adution with the looks they were born with (well..i suppose some could have surgery first). But over all i think they just generally put beautiful people on tv.
2006-07-29 10:39:58 · answer #6 · answered by melissa c 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They're attractive to begin with but so are most people. Then they have a lot of help with make-up, hair, a stylist, diet, and exercise, and of course the air-brushing for magazines. One other thing.....they get paid a lot of money to look good and if you had all that happening you would look just as good 24/7.
2006-07-29 10:47:50 · answer #7 · answered by daljack -a girl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is not only their looks that make them stars, it is their quality to perform their art, wether it is in singing, acting, writing or any form of art. And yes cosmetics can do many wonders.My view.
2006-07-29 10:42:30 · answer #8 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wouldnt we all look fantastic with a stylist standing right by and a professional photographer taking shots of us?
my answer: cosmetically created (although a lot of people do have natural beauty!)
2006-07-29 10:41:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i must say that some of them are attractive (not SO attractive though), and some are cosmetically created, oh, and their photos are digitally enhanced as well so as to hide their flaws, except of course photos taken by a paparazzo.
2006-07-29 10:45:16 · answer #10 · answered by jose 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋