English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

GIVE ME YEAH!!!

2006-07-29 03:32:39 · 51 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

51 answers

I never was much for coddling criminals. I guess I am in the minority. It is my considered oppinion that whacking off a few extraneous parts might act as a future deterent. Especially if it were done on Saturday afternoon in the town square two hours before he is lead to the gallows along with all the litter bugs.

2006-07-29 03:51:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No!

It is the power that the rapist has over the victim that is the turn-on, not the act itself.

If they cannot use their dicks, they will only use something else - causing even more pain, anguish and injury to the victim.

I think they should be just locked up and the key thrown away!

2006-07-29 03:38:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What happens if the rapist is a woman, it does happen. I know the huge majority of rapists are men but if it was a woman what would you chop off then?

2006-07-29 04:06:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

hi anybody, it extremely is South Africa - have you ever men forgotten already. it extremely is the desirable u . s . a . in the worldwide for criminals. you may homicide somebody and sit down in the penal complex for the weekend and be out Monday morning and not pay your television License and sit down in penal complex for 2 years. it extremely is South Africa. Any unlawful immigrant can come into the rustic and get citizenship (a ideal passport) for extra or less R50.00. I as quickly as study a piece of writing in a newspaper (The Citizen) the place a ninety 3 hundred and sixty 5 days previous lady grow to be raped. Which individual of their precise ideas does issues like this. it extremely is South Africa. ought to I say extra - no actual i'm disgusted.

2016-12-14 15:58:04 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I BELIVE THEY SHOULD, however this is still not good enough as they have dramatically traumatised there victum who would probably be scared to do do most things that you and i take for granted so for that reason i think that the death penality should be brought back in, so although small the poor victum will then know that the offending person will never do this disgusting crime ever again

2006-07-29 21:58:14 · answer #5 · answered by simon g 1 · 0 0

I think rapists should be given the death sentence because unlike murderous, their victims will still be alive living with constant fear and personal trauma which will inevitably affect their lives and their love ones for a huge part of their lives.

All that pain and anguish just for a f uck!

2006-07-29 03:37:17 · answer #6 · answered by GoateeBoy 3 · 1 0

Not in America, people complain about the way they are put to death for capital punishment and now you want dicks?

2006-08-01 13:31:40 · answer #7 · answered by SlapADog 4 · 0 0

I think thiefs should gettheir arms chopped off murderers die rapist get their dicks cut off,

2006-07-29 03:36:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I beleive a eye for a eye. They should be raped in the same manner that they raped the victem. Men have hole to be vilated just as females do. And after that yes they should be chopped off.

2006-07-29 03:35:14 · answer #9 · answered by loverbird20032003 2 · 0 0

well some christians beleive in an eye for an eye but u can just lock up the rapist instead of chopping off their genitals..they myt die...

2006-07-29 03:48:28 · answer #10 · answered by tazz 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers