Yes. Everything. Even the Kennedy assassination, the Titanic, the Civil War, slavery, the Black Plague, and the fall of Rome can be blamed on him.
2006-07-29 01:29:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7
·
1⤊
12⤋
Too tired to go into all of it, but NO. The recession started in 1999. So other then doing nothing to alleviate it, he inherited the slowdown post Y2K. The North Korean thing is something that dates back to 53. The middles east thing goes to 1948. I don't care for his domestic policies, but even I am not going to lay all this on his ***.
And as far as the history is concerned here is a bit of it:
World War III began when the Terrorist decided to attack the US on September 11, 2001 and drag us into the border skirmish that has been going on in the Middle-East since 1948.
It has to be remembered that Israel was our main allies in the Middle East when the majority of Arab nations were sided with the Soviet Union. It also has to be remembered that the Soviets oppressed the Christians and the Jews, but gave Islam free reign. Also while the Arabs say they were there first, there has been a Jewish presence when Israel is not going back to antiquity, and while Rome did scatter the Jews, even after 73 C.E. there remained a Jewish presence there. The Arabs want to deny this, but it has been proved via archaeological findings. The Arabs are NOT innocent in this at all, they are not Victims at all. Jordan was created by the Arabs to prevent Palestine from being located there. All of this anti-Jews, and US nonsense is Arab propaganda.
It also has to be noted that we have never supported Israel with by putting our troops into their war. This is not the same for the Arabs. We have put our troops on the ground to keep them out of the fire.
2006-07-29 01:40:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is the man at the top, the man at the top should be the blame for everything even bugs in your lawn. He should take responsibility for anything that happens or in the words of Harry Truman, "the buck stops here."
2006-07-29 01:30:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Everything is George W. Bush's fault, especially the weather and the bugs in your lawn. Impeach the incompetent %#%)(^&($%$@* because he can't kill the lawn bugs!! No blood for bugs! No blood for bugs! :)
Ahhh, to be an actual liberal, I would need a lobotomy. May God bless and keep you.
2006-07-29 01:29:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by blowry007 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
As long as the bugs aren't spy bugs listening in on you from the CIA, then I'd not put Bush to blame. Everything else, though, yes.
2006-07-29 01:29:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by reiwo023-9085j 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
fake..... yet he benefits a minimum of as a lot blame as Obama.... All this combating and bitterness between the liberal and conservative public, at the same time as actually, there is not any longer that a lot distinction between the oppressive Bush administration and the oppressive Obama administration... Divide and conquer, do not fall for it..... RON PAUL IN 2012!
2016-11-26 22:15:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course not everything is Bush's fault, just the occupation of Iraq, largest deficit in the history of the US, destruction of the environment, the poor response to hurricane damage in the south, largest growth in the government ever, destruction of our freedoms in the name of the war on terror, the US being less safe than ever before, growing gap between the rich and the poor, destruction of the US middle class, oil prices being higher than ever before, students being left behind more than ever before. making it harder for people to vote, more people with no health care than ever before, minimum wage not being increased in 9 years (while the congress got 3 raises), the list goes on but I can't spend all day writing all of the things that are his administrations fault.
2006-07-29 01:39:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jim C 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I heard bush played a huge part in the big bang and also controls the movement of the tectonic plates around the ring of fire.
2006-07-29 01:37:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by mason x 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush is a chip off the old block--his old man started something and he is hell bent on finishing it--I dont thing either of them were cut out to do the job??
2006-07-29 01:36:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ron~N 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
When people are frustrated they tend to look for a scape goat and Bush seems to be the ideal one. Depending where you come from.
2006-07-29 01:33:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Hennie M 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, you guys have been blaming Clinton for 14 years!
2006-07-29 01:36:14
·
answer #11
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
0⤊
0⤋