English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

please email me if you give a correct answer and also i feel this can some way be basis of unified field theory.eg. when earth rotates it produce a field an hence charges are in motion producing electromagnetic field and hence gravitation. It can open a new face for UFL.

2006-07-29 01:01:23 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Physics

5 answers

The following thoughts may be of interest to you. It is sort of lengthly, but that comes with the type question. We begin by looking at the electron. Even though earth's magnetic field is due to planet rotation, it is still the electron that is the basis of its existence.


It is the electron and its multiples that form all magnetic fields. Second, we need to take a look at the force of gravity and then compare the two.

The electron. This is a small bit of matter formed of electromagnetic energy. This is obvious in that a very high frequency of this energy entering near the nucleus of an atom is able to form electron pairs - negative and positive electrons. In forming an electron a monopole is made. This means an electron has one-half the frequency of the original electromagnetic energy bound in the southern half of the electron as "mass" (offers resistence to movement) and the northern half form magnetic lines extending outward. The center of the electron has an electric field through the plane of its equator. These three parts of the electron are formed of electromagnetic energy.

Multiples of the electron form neutrons and protons, which become the mass of our universe. Because mass is composed of electromagnetic energy, it has an unchangable value of "c" inherent in its composition. That value would be realized were an electron to be taken apart. What would instantly happen is an electromagnetic wave would be released. The value of "c" was there all along.

Secondly, we need to consider the origin of gravitational waves. These waves are formed of a relationship between mass and energy. The equation for a gravitational field is c2 = E/m. It is also that of a field of physical time. Notice if there were no energy to be divisible by mass, then there could be no gravitational field. As the value of "E" changes so, also, does that of the field, c2.

The existence of gravitational waves is obvious. In that the force of gravity performs work, it must have an energy source. It is impossible to perfrom work apart from having some kind of energy. What we need to know is how do the waves (a) form, and what are they (b) formed of.

(a) How the waves form. The basis of gravitational waves is that of the electromagnetic energy that formed the electron. Remember that the value of "c" was the basis of that mass. What the electron did in forming the mass was to complete a circle of more than 360 degrees and overlap part of its frequency, thus remaining bonded to its own frequency, while forming into three dimensions.

As an individual electron, or large mass, moves there is a change in its overall frequency. The lines of frequency become more dense in direction of movement and less dense at right angles to that direction. This is why a mass is able to move, and why it remains moving in its original direction, and at its original speed until some of that increased frequency is given to another mass. If there is no manner for that frequency to be shared, then mass must continue to move.

But what happens when a mass is unable to move. It is still three dimensional, occupying the same space, but there is no evidence of the frequency change within the mass. This brings us to:

(b) Why gravitational waves exist and how to relate their existence to mass. It is stated that were a mass to approach to near the speed of light that it would become much shorter in the direction of movement. That is true. Because mass has as its basis electromagnetic energy, it must act in the same manner as what comprises it. The thought in short form is as follows:

E = hf, electromagnetic energy is equal to its frequency times Plank's constant.

mk = hf, mass kinetic energy operates exactly the same way as does electromagnetic energy. When there is an increase of energy in one direction, the overall line density in that direction increases. The energy values at right angles to direction of travel decreases in proportion to that of the forward one. Mass does not gain mass as it moves, it transfers energy (E) from dimensions to dimension.

c = hf, is the last part. The value of "c" is that of a particular form of wave energy - perhaps that of "h".

Now we are able to compare two different masses, in two different locations, doing the same thing but in different manners.

First is that of a mass in a speeding spaceship. The mass is going at a speed of light minus 25 mps. At this speed the mass would be, to an observer standing at a right angle to it, as though it were a very thin line in space. The forward dimension would have become compressed according to mk = hf. The obvious energy nature of this object is that of its movement, it having potential greatest in direction of travel, and proportionately less at right angles to it.

Second, lets take a look at a mass within our planet that is 0.717 miles from the core point. The nature of that mass is, were it to be able to freely fall, is that it would instantly be moving toward the center of our planet at the same speed as the first mass illustration in outer space, moving at the speed of light minus 25 mps. BUT this mass within our planet is not going any place, point to point. It is forced to remain 0.717 miles from the core point of our planet through all time.

What is the comparison between the two masses so that we may determine how gravitational waves form?

Were you to take the mass of outer space, and were it exactly the same size as the one within the core area of our planet, and were you to exchange them, it could be done with no problem. The one presently in the core of earth would immediately be accelerating at the speed of light minus 25 mps in outer space, were it released there. Then the one that had been zipping along in outer space could be fitted into the core of earth, where the other had been, and there would be no disruption. How is that possible?

The moving mass in outer space has obvious kinetic energy associated to it. The one in the center of our planet has the same value of mk = hf within just as it had when switched with the one in outer space, but now instead of there existing mass moving according to the value of visual kinetic energy [TIME MOVES MASS] (mk = hf), the earh mass is now moving time according to mass plus energy [MASS MOVES TIME] (still, mk = hf). The frequency (E - gravitational waves) of the earth mass escapes at the speed of light according to the frequency of hf. If the energy (frequency) of the mass within earth were to decrease, so would its relative speed (mk = hf, and a person could no longer exchange it with the one remaining in outer space). The hf value demonstrates the kind of energy contained within the earth mass, and as long as the energy value continues to exist (heat) so, also, do the propigation of gravitational waves.

http://timebones.blogspot.com

2006-07-29 06:29:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Electro-magnetism comes from the Sun and Earths rotation creatates gravity. The two combine when reaching each other and produce life as we know it. The Ancient Greeks knew this.

2006-07-29 08:09:16 · answer #2 · answered by tonyintoronto@rogers.com 4 · 0 0

There's a crossover between the electric and the magnetic and a tiny default zone for gravity at the crossover point.

2006-07-29 08:18:43 · answer #3 · answered by Fredrick Carley 2 · 0 0

Your asking for the ultimate theory of physics. No one can answer it yet.

2006-07-29 13:57:41 · answer #4 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 0 0

Your Nobel prize has your name on it if you pull this one off.

2006-07-29 08:05:22 · answer #5 · answered by iansand 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers