Do you believe that we are the sons & daughters of Monkeys & apes ? If not, from where the human-beings came ? Who was the first mother ever ? From where she came ?
2006-07-29 00:09:58 · 23 answers · asked by White Peacock 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Earth Sciences & Geology
If there were Adam & Eve, we cannot believe in Darwin's theory of evolution.
If Darwin was true in his theory, we can't believe Bible.
Darwin theory has been rejected as under:
"Darwin trusted information that was wrong, specifically Lamarckism, according to which, the acquired characteristics are inherited to the next generation. That is to say, that the long neck of the giraffe was the evolutionary result of the attempt of stretching, of many generations. Of course, the modern Biology of today, with the knowledge of the genetic material and code, realizes how untenable this supposition is.
The wealth of the science of today and its opposition with the untenable and proven wrong theory of Darwin, are forcing, all the time more, scientists to raise their voices and tell the truth.
In an article of Science magazine in October 2002, is mentioned that the educational council of one of the bigger school districts of the USA, decided unanimously to change the book of Biology in Primary and High school and to cite that the theory of evolution is a view that has not been proven.
2006-07-29 07:02:46 · answer #1 · answered by Pink Phantom 3 · 5⤊ 8⤋
You have answered your own question.
It is Darwins Theory of evolution, not Darwins FACT OF EVOLUTION.
there is a big difference, a theory can be anything, but it requires solid proof, which is why till date it is a theory,
We are the children of Adam and Eve
We havent come here by fluke, But by design, and by the design of our God.
The theory that life could have evolved is too far fetched,
in that case why are monkeys still monkeys.
there are some people who might still say The big bang, and carbon and what not you can ask them this,
How can all the required elements come together so well and form life.
try this test and you will know how silly they sound.
Open up the remote of your television, Now you know that it is a tv remote. Remove all its parts, every single screw and chip, every number button u see in it, seperate them all,
you are still sure that they are a part of the TV remote.
Now put all of them in loose form in a box, Start shaking the box, playing with it , shake it for a thousand years and see if all components get back to thier original self and for a remote.
Scientific statistic says if such an experiment is done, the chances of the remote forming by itself are one in 60000 trillion.
Then what chances are there that life has come out of totally unrelated elements over a period of time.
2006-07-29 09:33:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, I don't think he ever said that we were the sons and daughters of monkeys and apes.
He may have been a bit off, but the theory is a step in understanding how we came to be the way we are.
If we all came from one mother, we would most likely have died out already by spreading some recessive genes like wildfire.
2006-07-29 07:14:53 · answer #3 · answered by bistekoenighasteangst 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Theory of Evolution does not tell that we are the sons of monkeys & apes. This is wrong understanding. The theory indicates that the origin of man and other apes are the same. It is not yet discovered but it can be belived.
2006-07-29 07:31:43 · answer #4 · answered by Lutfor 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do believe what scientists say about this, but they don't say we are the sons and daughters of Monkeys & apes. They say we have the same ancestors. And they were the sons and daughters of other species. So I think the first mother ever consisted of one cell. But we know so little about it!
2006-07-29 07:19:30 · answer #5 · answered by Agnes K 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I believe in Darwin's theories, though I know he wasn't talking about apes and monkeys that are on earth today - something much different.
Remember - Darwin also acknowledged a higher power that started it all...
2006-07-29 10:20:05 · answer #6 · answered by Tiffany5 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Man is certainly the product of organic evolution.From propliopithecus to Homo sapiens is the journey through stages which are described in the text books.Cro magnon was the most recent form.Neo-Darwinism is the causo-mechanical explanation of the origin of species.Chimpanzee and human genes about are 99% or so alike.
2006-07-29 07:22:24 · answer #7 · answered by nkmy83@yahoo.com 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Darwin Theory has been rejected recently, by Science itself.
And at least I am not going to follow a rejected Theory.
Science has to follow a long path to explore the source of
evolution of Human Being.
2006-07-29 07:38:07 · answer #8 · answered by TruthMiner 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Humans, apes and monkeys had a common ancestor we are not the sons and daughters of them.
2006-07-29 07:38:47 · answer #9 · answered by kano7_1985 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Because the Hindu Mythology speaks about it 5000 years ago. Water born species first , the part water/part land, then land, part animal/part man and then man -Given as sequence of the evolution in Hindu scriptures.
VR
2006-07-29 07:16:02 · answer #10 · answered by sarayu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, because he found a lot of evidences on the Evolution of different spiecies after travelling.
2006-07-29 08:28:27 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋