English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-28 20:49:26 · 10 answers · asked by pratham_not_edna 3 in News & Events Current Events

10 answers

i would say that most of these answers are stupid ,,, and let me save many people time .. if u are living in america or england and had never been out of there then dont answer questions like that.... because the us media only shows u wat they want u to know, so dont trust anything that america says....
the war is because of one israeli soilder that lebenon took as a POW,,, and israel found this a reason too attack lebenon so they would slowy pull iran into this and america with the help of the UN take control of iran as they did in iraq and other countries... but wat u dont know is israel too hase over 20 lebonese soilders as prisoners, and lebenon said that we can trade u ur soilder with one of our, but they didnt want that so they started attacking lebenon and killing many inocents which most of them are children....

and for many people i want to say do some research before u answer......

thank you

2006-07-29 00:31:15 · answer #1 · answered by Matthew 2 · 0 3

It is a result of a well planned political trics.... it began since long time but the kestone layed by the death of Rafeeq Hariry's assasination. the people who played in behind the assasination of Rafiq hariry(The formar Labanies president) planed to be like this present situation because, as a result of Rafiq's death Siriyan Forces were withdrawn from lebnon and via this act Israel made it's easy way to distroy lebnon.......and its grouth in middle-east. Israel made themself the reason of missing soldier... otherwise how this much powerfull force should miss their two solders by this one millitant group(remember Hisbullah is not a country's militory it is just a millitant group)

2006-07-29 06:15:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Israel is not at war with Lebanon it is at war with Hezzbollah, and the cowards are using Lebanon as a shield. Lebanon, hadn't figure it out really. If Israel was at war with Lebanon they wouldn't be warning them of the coming attacks.

2006-07-29 04:18:36 · answer #3 · answered by spider 4 · 0 0

I hate long answers,but :

Let Israel win the war

Friday, July 28th, 2006

What other country, when attacked in an unprovoked aggression across a recognized international frontier, is then put on a countdown clock by the world and given a limited time window in which to fight back, regardless of whether it has restored its own security?
What other country sustains 1,500 indiscriminate rocket attacks into its cities - every one designed to kill, maim and terrorize civilians - and is then vilified by the world when it tries to destroy the enemy's infrastructure and strongholds with precision-guided munitions that sometimes have the unintended but unavoidable consequence of collateral civilian death and suffering?
Hearing the world pass judgment on the Israel-Hezbollah war as it unfolds is to live in an Orwellian moral universe. With a few significant exceptions (the leadership of the United States, Britain, Australia, Canada and a very few others), the world - governments, the media, UN bureaucrats - has completely lost its moral bearings.
The word that obviates all thinking and magically inverts victim into aggressor is "disproportionate," as in the universally decried "disproportionate Israeli response."
When the United States was attacked at Pearl Harbor, it did not respond with a parallel "proportionate" attack on a Japanese naval base. It launched a four-year campaign that killed millions of Japanese, reduced Tokyo, Hiroshima and Nagasaki to cinders, and turned the Japanese home islands to rubble and ruin. Disproportionate? No.
When one is wantonly attacked by an aggressor, one has every right - legal and moral - to carry the fight until the aggressor is disarmed and so disabled that it cannot threaten one's security again. That's what it took with Japan.
Britain was never invaded by Germany in World War II. Did Britain respond to the blitz and V-1 and V-2 rockets with "proportionate" aerial bombardment of Germany? Of course not. British Prime Minister Winston Churchill orchestrated the greatest land invasion in history that flattened and utterly destroyed Germany, killing untold innocent German women and children in the process.
The perversity of today's international outcry lies in the fact that there is indeed a disproportion in this war, a radical moral asymmetry between Hezbollah and Israel: Hezbollah is deliberately trying to create civilian casualties on both sides while Israel is deliberately trying to minimize civilian casualties, also on both sides.
In perhaps the most blatant terror campaign from the air since the London blitz, Hezbollah is raining rockets on Israeli cities and villages. The rockets are packed with ball bearings that can penetrate automobiles and shred human flesh. They are meant to kill and maim. And they do.
But it is a dual campaign. Israeli innocents must die in order for Israel to be terrorized. But Lebanese innocents also must die in order for Israel to be demonized, which is why Hezbollah hides its fighters, its rockets, its launchers, its entire infrastructure among civilians. Creating human shields is a war crime. It is also a Hezbollah specialty.
On Wednesday, CNN cameras showed destruction in Tyre. What does Israel have against Tyre? Nothing. But the long-range Hezbollah rockets that have been raining terror on Haifa are based in Tyre. What is Israel to do?
Had Israel wanted to destroy Lebanese civilian infrastructure, it would have turned out the lights in Beirut in the first hour of the war, destroying the billion-dollar power grid and setting back Lebanon 20 years. It did not do that. Instead, it attacked dual-use infrastructure - bridges, roads, airport runways - and blockaded Lebanon's ports to prevent the reinforcement and resupply of Hezbollah. Ten thousand Katyusha rockets are enough. Israel was not going to allow Hezbollah 10,000 more.
Israel's response to Hezbollah has been to use the most precise weaponry and targeting it can. It has no interest, no desire to kill Lebanese civilians. Does anyone imagine that it could not have leveled south Lebanon, to say nothing of Beirut? Instead, in the bitter fight against Hezbollah in south Lebanon, it has repeatedly dropped leaflets, issued warnings, sent messages by radio and even phone text to Lebanese villagers to evacuate so that they would not be harmed.
Israel knows that these leaflets and warnings give the Hezbollah fighters time to escape and regroup. The advance notification as to where the next attack is coming has allowed Hezbollah to set up elaborate ambushes. The result? Unexpectedly high Israeli infantry casualties. Moral scrupulousness paid in blood. Israeli soldiers die so that Lebanese civilians will not, and who does the international community condemn for disregarding civilian life?

2006-07-29 03:58:55 · answer #4 · answered by quikzip7 6 · 0 0

first, as what others have already said, it's not a war between lebanon and israel. it is a conflict between hezbollah and israel. given that, the immediate cause of the war between them is the kidnapping/killing of two israeli soldiers by hezbollah.

but there are deep underlying causes as well.

one, the kidnapping/killing of israeli soldiers is a way for hezbollah - with go signal from iran which actually controls it - to put a double pressure on israel as it wages another conflict in gaza. hezbollah expects war to come from this and has in fact prepared for one. but it is not the kind of war we usually think of. it is a war that will cause the arab world to be united against israel. to achieve this, israel must inflict damage on lebanese civilians and be seen as intruding into lebanese sovereignty. and to in order to do that, hezbollah operatives, arms and equipment must be located well within population centers, not just in southern lebanon. a long, protracted conflict will also play to hezbollah's advantage.

second, since iran controls hezbollah and war material is actually coming from it (and syria), this is a war by proxy. iran is testing its capabilities of intruding into israeli territory and executing special ops, exemplified by the kidnapping; finding out how a double pressure can wear down israel's new leadership; etc. basically, as far as iran is concerned, this is a geo-political test, test, test. it is also one way of diverting attention from their nuclear activities, although i think there are indications that they are failing in this respect.

sorry for the long answer but i hope it helped.

2006-07-29 05:54:15 · answer #5 · answered by mazusano 1 · 0 0

As you know israil is the name of grandson of abraham (the prophrt. jewdish thinks that all middle east is for the sons of israil no others. thay thinks that they are better frome other. people created to serve them.
this belive is the cuse of the war

2006-07-29 04:00:41 · answer #6 · answered by sia 2 · 0 0

You can find it somewhere around the 5th chapter in Genesis. Good luck sorting all that out.

2006-07-29 03:59:45 · answer #7 · answered by Steve W 3 · 0 0

yeah
goldenboy is absolutely rite
GoldenBoy, IM me. I wanna talk to u

2006-07-29 07:49:34 · answer #8 · answered by Zolo 2 · 0 0

http://tinyurl.com/rj9uo

See for yourself.

2006-07-29 08:05:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

tgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

2006-07-29 03:58:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers