2006-07-28 20:48:44 · 8 answers · asked by sarad 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
if it is the UN security council you are referring to, then they maybe should be a permanent member. as soon as they begin to act like a mature country. as long as the collective national mentality remains pacificistic and juvenile, they dont deserve it. how can you give a permanent seat to a country that is constantly terrorized by its neighbor and by its own people and cant deal with it? as long as india's best defense against its problems is "fasting", it should not get a permanent seat.
2006-07-28 23:06:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
A good case could be made for it. But I doubt that it will happen soon -- trying to get the UN to agree on anything is like trying to herd cats.
2006-07-29 03:54:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes By all means.
2006-07-29 03:52:40 · answer #3 · answered by raju 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes!
2006-07-29 03:50:36 · answer #4 · answered by aap36rob 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think all nations must have one equal vote in the UN or it must be reconstituted to represent people in proportion to pupulaiton. exclusive power clubs suck.
2006-07-29 03:56:50 · answer #5 · answered by boogie man 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if you are willing to serve USA agenda yes. if you are not willing nooooooooooooo
2006-07-29 03:58:40 · answer #6 · answered by moral910 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, they aren't important.
2006-07-29 03:50:43 · answer #7 · answered by bigbadleroybrown 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No
2006-07-29 03:50:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋