The only support Saddam is going to get is a rope.
Yes it's sad, but the U.N. the E.U. NATO and America have to babysit these Muslim countries because they can't take care of themselve's.
2006-07-28 20:22:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Support Saddam!?! That is absolutely insane. I am not a big fan of Bush but at least he isn't a wimp and he never torture the US soccer team for losing like Saddam. Bush never used chemical weapons on a US city like Saddam did to many northern Shite and Kurd villages. When we took him out 1 in 3 families in Iraq have at least one missing family member whom was arrested and "disappeared" into Iraqi dungeons never to be seen again until we started finding mass graves, just the same they will never be returned to their families and by virtue of Saddam would never receive Islamic Burial Rights.
Is Iraq better now? They would still be better off even if they were in a nine way civil war, at least now they can all disagree and fight each other until they come to an agreement. Under Saddam it is agree or be tortured to death.
Afghanistan, it still has a bunch of clitoris clipping nuts running around but at least they are unified against it. They don't have the kind of factions you find in the mid east proper.
Lebanon is tricky, I do feel for the people that are reasonable and don't support Hezbollah, But it seems to me there is a real lack of common since there. Okay Israel gives land back to Lebanon, things are okay, then the same people who built your hospitals and schools turn around and attack Israel. So, what to do?
Do you :
(A) pretend it didn't happen
(B) condemn Hezbollah for disrupting the
tenuious peace
(C) blame Israel for not sitting back and
enjoying the Hezzbollah fireworks.
Really the best solution is to pick your friends better. Because a real friend dosen't attack a stronger neighbor and then hide behind you when said neighbor responds.
2006-07-28 20:21:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by spider 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
properly, a favourite protection rigidity makes use of a /lot/ of petroleum products, extraordinarily in an invasion, so i'm specific it exchange right into a important subject. Any income reaped via oil companies from contracts in Iraq would be miniscule in comparison to the expenses of the conflict. the real function oil performs is as a strategic source. usa has no determination yet to maintain a stable protection rigidity presence interior the middle east, to gaurantee this is grant of oil. because of the fact, devoid of that grant, this is protection rigidity could could be usually undercut. beforehand of the 2d Iraq conflict, that presence secure Saudi Arabia. this is been moved to Iraq.
2016-11-03 06:03:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
saddam
afghan
2006-07-31 00:03:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
???
2006-07-28 19:47:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by JOE 4
·
0⤊
0⤋