How urgent it is to reduce global population? http://www.freewebs.com/overpopulation1/?

Question

All kinds of ecological damage and depletion of unrenewable resources are proportional to population density.

Answer 1

I think you already know the degree of urgency. If after reading the site you linked above, you have any doubt, please come to Africa or Asia, the slums of South America, to the new settlements in the Amazon, and then ask yourself the question again.

You may only need to visit the rapidly developing East Coast of the United States. Or any metropolis such as NYC, Washington, DC, Boston, Chicago, LA, San Francisco, etc.

Answer 2

That's why we need to increase the spread of the HIV virus to places like China and India. We're doing a good job of clearing out Africa, and once we take out those hubs of excessive population, the management of global resources will become much easier.

Answer 3

some have inspired killing people. maximum of them do no longer in all risk understand the undertaking that nicely. first of all, I agree a hundred% with the quote you submit, yet i do no longer think of killing people to shrink call for is going to alter something. For one, people will in basic terms be born. 2d, the undertaking isn't extremely plenty what number of people there are, yet how plenty those anybody is ingesting. One significant area of the communique is that lots of the folk who recommend inhabitants administration tend to concentration on the advent up worldwide and scapegoat them for the environmental disaster, whilst if actuality be told, this is basically the progressed worldwide, which has a plenty decrease inhabitants, this is inflicting lots of the themes. There are 3 considerable factors that bypass into environmental destruction--intake, technologies, and inhabitants. people who purely concentration on inhabitants or evaluate that the variety one situation fail to contemplate the different factors. We right here in the progressed worldwide (and the U. S. extraordinarily), notwithstanding having a quite low inhabitants, are the variety one clientele and have the main environmentally damaging technologies, and as such are plenty extra of a risk. additionally, a great variety of the environmental degradation that does happen in the advent up worldwide, which includes deforestation, pollution, over-searching, etc, are finished for the income of the clientele in the advent up worldwide, and purely drives people in those international locations into extra suitable poverty, for that reason making them extra desperate and keen to interrupt their ecosystems, lower back, for the income persons. the actual answer to ending the two the environmental disaster AND worldwide poverty is to kill customer subculture--no longer people. i'm despite if supportive of birth control and abortion, as long because it is not forced onto a inhabitants. And it may be pushed right here in the progressed worldwide extra suitable than the advent up worldwide, which isn't the way it has a tendency to happen. Having purely some babies in the advent up worldwide is a terrible element for plenty of the folk residing there, with the aid of fact to stay to tell the tale families regularly want as many babies as they are in a position to so those people could contribute. lowering relatives length with out concurrently lowering poverty will purely force those families into extra suitable poverty, and could consequently no longer be effectual. The brunt of the duty and of the situation should be on us, no longer the advent up worldwide.

Answer 4

Not very urgent..
Overpopulation and Global Warming are exaggerated
by fear mongers...