English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Which one is better? And why? And yes this is a question about SEX!

2006-07-28 18:28:05 · 14 answers · asked by Gumby G 2 in Social Science Gender Studies

14 answers

Personally, I prefer an intact man. When giving head, he's much more sensitive. During sex, the forskin retracts back and adds a nice extra sensation as he's stroking in & out.

Forget about the old stereotypes that still linger about them. They're not dirtier or smellier than cut ones unless the man doesn't practice good hygiene. No, they're not more prone to giving diseases or getting infections than their cut counterparts. Those have been debunked time after time!

2006-07-28 18:35:55 · answer #1 · answered by mnbaby2156 2 · 2 0

Although out society looks down on a male who is uncircumcised, there is real research that shows that an uncircumcised will stimulate a female orgasm better than a circumcised one, and also, the male will have a better quality orgasm.

I however, have only been with men with a circumcised penis.

2006-07-29 03:17:19 · answer #2 · answered by lizsk8er182 2 · 0 0

I prefer a man that is circumcised because he is cleaner less sensitive for when I get a little rough and bigger cock 2

2006-07-29 01:43:41 · answer #3 · answered by Amanda E 1 · 0 0

I've had it both ways, but I prefer circumcised.

2006-07-29 01:42:58 · answer #4 · answered by kellygirlaj 4 · 0 0

Circumcised or not that is the question ! Well my answer is that it is immaterial. As long as he's clean and disease free...in this age of AIDS...no glove ,,no love....Be responsible

2006-07-29 02:58:54 · answer #5 · answered by prettycoolchick38 4 · 0 0

circumcision!!!!! the extra skin flap is like a one way ticket to the door...ewww

2006-07-29 09:26:42 · answer #6 · answered by ninjachik1979 4 · 0 0

sex is good either way. whats the point of a circumsised asshole, its the guy that makes the sex great not the skin.

2006-07-29 01:34:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It doesn't matter to me. If they're circumsised it does NOT mean they're cleaner, it's not that hard for an uncicrumsised guy to pull back foreskin to clean! God these people are stupid. --;

2006-07-29 01:35:22 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

It is better to be cut then it is to be uncut. But when it is hard, who really cares? Much cleaner when cut

2006-07-29 01:31:57 · answer #9 · answered by {Lisa} 3 · 0 0

I prefer uncircumcised, personal preference

2006-07-29 01:31:08 · answer #10 · answered by Gold B 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers