Evolution is a lie based on hoaxes, deception, pride ignorance :
I urge you to use discernment, reason and logic when thinking aobut evolution- all the things evolutionists accuse us of not using , but really- do the principles of evolution make sense? If this has taken place over the course of millions of years, little by little, then we are being decieved when we are told we are looking for "the missing link" we are looking for millions of missing links- besides that- there are so many common sense, scientific questions that evolution just cannot answer- no matter how you twist it.
If you are really interested in education and not just disproving something that does not fit your mold- read this article, it is fun reading but very informative and common sense-
Meet Gaspy: the lungfish:
http://www.reflecthisglory.org/study/did...
here are other bits of interesting fact for you to ponder :
Charles Dawson, a British lawyer and amateur geologist announced in 1912 his discovery of pieces of a human skull and an apelike jaw in a gravel pit near the town of Piltdown, England . . . Dawson's announcement stopped the scorn cold. Experts instantly declared Piltdown Man (estimated to be 300,000 to one million years old), the evolutionary find of the century. Darwin's missing link had been identified. Or so it seemed for the next 40 or so years. Then, in the early fifties . . . scientists began to suspect misattribution. In 1953, that suspicion gave way to a full-blown scandal: Piltdown Man was a hoax . . . tests proved that its skull belonged to a 600-year-old woman, and its jaw to a 500-year-old orangutan from the East Indies." Our Times--the Illustrated History of the 20th Century (Turner Publishing, 1995, page 94).
Science Fiction
The Piltdown Man fraud wasn't an isolated incident. The famed "Nebraska Man" was built from one tooth, which was later found to be the tooth of an extinct pig. "Java Man" was found in the early 20th Century, and was nothing more than a piece of skull, a fragment of a thigh bone and three molar teeth. The rest came from the deeply fertile imaginations of plaster of Paris workers. "Heidelberg Man" came from a jawbone, a large chin section and a few teeth. Most scientists reject the jawbone because it's similar to that of modem man. Still, many evolutionists believe that he's 250,000 years old. No doubt they pinpointed his birthday with good old carbon dating. Now there's reliable proof. Not according to Time magazine (June 11, 1990). They published an article in the science section that was subtitled, "Geologists show that carbon dating can be way off." Don't look to "Neanderthal Man" for any evidence of evolution. Recent genetic DNA research indicates the chromosomes do not match those of humans. They do match those of bipedal primates (apes).
What does Science Say?
Here are some wise words from a few respected men of science: "Evolution is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless." (Professor Louis Bounoure, Director of Research, National Center of Scientific Research). "Evolution is unproved and unprovable." (Sir Arthur Keith--he wrote the foreword to the 100th edition of, Origin of the Species). "Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever." (Dr. T. N. Tahmisian, Atomic Energy Commission, USA).
"To suppose that the eye . . . could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree." Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species
A great resource for some education that is logical and common sense is called "The Science or Evolution: expand your mind" You can get this DVD from WayoftheMaster.com
2006-07-30 16:29:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Evolution.(period)
Just pisses me off!
If we evolved from a MONKEy,
We would have different ways to percieve the world then the monkey does.
Where does that monkey come from??
A little baboon, now were does that baboon come from?
A little prairie dog!!?
Now where does that prairie dog come from?
A rat!!?
Where does that rat come from?
An insect?
So right now you are calling any mamal that exists an insect?
Evolution says we had to start from cells.
Do you know that the human body is made up of meisois and metois.
They dot come together to make one, like humans do.
Instead they spilt, from themselves!
What would cause all the living cells on earth to reproduct?
They should spilt!
That would mean that they would have to start from one point in orgin or we would keep spilting till theres nothing....the facts are that there is no way that evolution is real!
A computer was programmed in an attempt to arrive at the simple 26 letter alphabet. After 35,000,000,000,000 (35 trillion) attempts it has only arrived at 14 letters correctly. What are the odds that a simple single cell organism could evolve with the complexity of more than 60,000 proteins of 100 different configurations all in the correct places? Never in eternity. Time does not make impossible things possible.
The thing is we we are all made, not by what people think today is god, but the creator.
He made us for a porpose and that purpose is to create.
And to make perfection perfected upon!
(god i hate when some one says the word evolution!)
Dude this was you 7 million years ago!
http://www.turtletrack.org/Issues00/Co08262000/Art/pdinwild.jpg
And this was the human race 2.0 billion years ago!
http://www.extension.umn.edu/yardandgarden/EntWeb/quizarchives/images/confused.jpg
And this was life at the beganing of time (a mesiosis)
http://web.jjay.cuny.edu/~acarpi/NSC/images/cell.gif
They JUST POPPED INTO EXISTENCE.
ooo and they can reproduce with two just some how??
2006-07-28 16:26:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolution by far involves a great deal of belief... or presumptions ... so far nothing has been proved, and nothing has precedent... Religion - not even, Bible does have tangencies to science, and in fact more and more science proves Bible to be true, and philosophy is in fact an educated summary of things already occurring and observed. Philosophy teaches reason, or common sense at best...
Science is based on what you can test, and mind you even thought technology is so advanced, there's so much more yet to be discovered, in order to make a good educated guess...
Religion has closed up people into hitting a platform, and staying there... not search further...
I find the Bible more refreshing... there's endless discoveries that come with just reading the Bible. It's got a thousand meaningful lessons in only one paragraph. You can never drain its fountain. Besides, a lot of science's new discoveries are common knowledge among Bible readers...
2006-07-28 16:03:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Pivoine 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is evolution. the basis of religion is that a ghost created everything that was and will be on the earth and in the universe. how is that any easier to believe than evolution? there are almost an infinite number of galaxies out there, atleast 1 for every grain of sand on every beach on the earth and each galaxy contains several thousands of stars. how is it unbelieveable that the right atoms were formed somewhere in an infinite space to create life which then evolved into thinking beings.
No matter what, you have to asume that either all the mater in the universe was just there or you have to asume that god was just there. there is an infinite number of chances that life could exist somewhere in the universe. and if it does exist, it will slowly mutate to form beings that are better fit for survival. it just so happens that humans evolved from monkies, and flourished because our brains were more fit for survival. the reason we dont still evolve is that there is no survival of the fittest. almost everyone survives because of our medical technology. if we didnt take care of our sick, humans would still be evolving.
2006-07-28 17:57:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Certainly NOT!
... having lately examined "the experts"' answers and written text on evolution's various aspects and "evidences"; let me tell you, quite knowledgably and forthrightly that there are much better and more obvious explanations for their 'findings' than what they are giving you!
So, Certainly not.
No; I have clearly disproven evolution myself.
I am working on books and theses re this whole range, including scientific evidence and concrete discovery which actually disprove the theory of evolution altogether!
So you can probably forget it as any possible valid explanation at all - that is, all of you excepting the well-paid 'die-hards' that have 'a wheel, axe and salary to grind' in Big institutions and in media - which have poured billions worldwide into the pursuit of evolution!
They won't drop it so easily, for 'neck reasons'.
2006-07-28 16:03:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by dr c 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolution concentrates on the *way* organic forms develop rather than their ultimate origin.
It's obvious that evolution is taking place, but that idea is not necessarily inconsistent with the idea of an act or event of creation that started it all. Creation in motion might involve evolving beings.
2006-07-28 16:20:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Exactly what argument does "evolution" make in regards to "the source of life"?
As I understand it Evolution says nothing about "the source" but instead starts with what is and applies deduction to theorize what could have been.
If I'm incorrect someone please straighten me out.
2006-07-28 15:58:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Snake Oil 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
leave religion out...philosophy and evolution is the ultimate source of our survival...teachers and learners produce a never ending growth in knowledge and wisdom while religion teaches the same thing over and over for centuries, and therefore closing our minds, hindering progress...who says we haven't continued to evolve??...haven't you noticed how far we have gone thorugh in terms of technology and philosophy during the past 2 to 3 decades?...findings of the scriptures of Judas and Mary Magdalene, the continous growth in number of the agnostics and atheists...cellphones, computers, cars, even robots...think about it...it's inevitable...it's our nature to learn and grow...
2006-07-28 16:30:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by wildeye_checks 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes.
There are no gods, therefore religion is a waste of time. It is also extremely dangerous. Just look at the muslims.
Religion maybe a philosophy, but philosophy isn't religion.
2006-07-28 15:57:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jolly1 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
in deed
you can not ignore the overwhelming evidence around us and evidence of evolution happening right now in front of our eyes
everything else is mythology and hypocrisy
to hashnowjust.....we are still evolving but in slow pace since we are adopting tools to make our life easier...we don't need to evolve on same level as our ancestors but we are changing ..simple exemplar: once you have got rid off a virus of some infectious disease you can get that disease again you immune system evolves and in future you are protected from that virus , your immune system evolved in new form
2006-07-28 15:55:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋