Why cant gay people admit sex with another man is not natural ?

Question

Your penis is made for reproduction. your anus is made for deficating. I am not asking about love , just the sexual act. I'll bet most answers either change the subject to religion, or are way off in left feild. I dont care what you do , I just have never heard anybody here admit - it aint right but im going to do it because i like it. - they always want to defend it - thats justs as hypocritical as the racists who will not admit there wrong but they like it and are going to keep doing it anyway.

If it was natural why would you need to defend it

Answer 1

O.K. I'm straight, but I find no "offense" about gay couples. But you are absolutely 100% correct by saying it's not "natural" meaning it's not what nature intended the penis to be used for...sticking it up the anus of another male. There is absolutely nothing "natural" about it.

I would like to hear a gay person admit this too. It will be interesting to read the comments.

****Once I again...I feel I must reiterate myself...I have NO PROBLEM with gay love or sexuality I was just agreeing to a logical point this guy has. Purely coming from a biological stand point..tis all.*******

Answer 2

We can't admit it because it's not true.

If the penis is made for reproduction, you are saying that you have never in your life used any birth control. Having sex with a piece of latex in between is certainly far less natural than having anal sex.

By your same argument, kissing is also unnatural. Mouths are made for eating. Why does pressing people's lips together make any sense?

Some of us (gay and straight alike) view sex as being primarily for pleasure than primarily for reproduction. There are plenty of men and women who will be sexually active their entire lives but never have any children. Is that unnatural?

You say you are afraid that most answers will go off and talk about something religious, but that you don't want that—and then promptly proceed to say "it ain't right." Right and wrong are religious concepts. You brought reliigon into this yourself. Please refrain from being hypocritical. It makes it very difficult to logically answer you.

It's neither right nor wrong, but you're right, I'm going to do it because I like it. Is that so horrible? People go to the beach because they like it. People by sports cars because they like. People get cats because they like it. Are you seriously implying that anything anyone likes is automatically bad?

Sure, an anus is made for defecating. If you were dreadfully sick and the only way to cure it was to take a suppository, would you do it? Sure. Just because something's primary use is one thing doesn't mean it's unnatural to do something else with it.

Your question is one of the most illogical I've answered all day, and that's really saying something.

Answer 3

Just because something isn't natural, or designed to be used that way, or that is not its main function, doesn't mean it's wrong to do so.

Was someone's finger made for shoving up their nose? I doubt it, and yet most of the population do it regularly (even if in private).

So it's not hypocritical to not admit "it aint right" because it is right. It's right, because it's between two people, who enjoy it, and causes no harm to either person (except for perhaps some physical pain, but missionary position sex can be painful to a woman the first time too).

So there is an answer without regards to religion, because you supposedly didn't ask in regards to religion. But just to reiterate, just because something is used for something other than it's "main" function, doesn't make it wrong.

Btw, the penis is for both urinating, reproduction, and sexual pleasure. If you, for religious reasons don't choose to use it for sexual pleasure, that is your choice, but that is one of the reasons it is there.

Answer 4

Your question has a real flaw in it...."not natural" is a relative term, applied by a Non-relative" person who has already formed opinions and doesn't really care what the answer is...he is making a biased statement in the guise of a question. And here is my reply which will not win "best answer." IF the penis is made AND USED only for reproduction, then please explain the HUGE business of contraceptives! If you truely believe your own statement, I assume that neither you nor your mate have ever used birth control. Fair???
IF the anus is only as you describe, please explain why so MANY straights practice anal sex...certainly far more than gays do, for there are just so many more straights than there are gays (9 times as many, in fact.) So where does your argument lead to??? It is based on NON factual ideas that are contridicted by Straights, not gays. Please note, I have NOT changed the subject, I have NOT strayed off on religion, and I am not coming from left field. I am answering your questions with reality. Your beliefs are based on bias, not reality. Gays practice sex the VERY SAME WAY straights practice sex...for pleasure. Baby production is more often than not, an accident of nature. If you were really honest, you would have to admit that neither straights nor gays start out sex with making babies in mind. Again, your argument falls flat on its face. Until Straights practice sex ONLY for reproduction, and until Straights NEVER practice anal sex, please come up with something harder to answer than this irrelevant drivel. Good luck
PS: this is in NO Way a defense of Gay sex...it is a critique of your question. I don't have to defend any actions I may take, you may take, or anyone else....it is absolutely THEIR business, neither of ours. But I must add that everytime I see an "attack" on Gays, it always comes around to "Natural," "Intended," "God's purpose," etc. All of these arguments are worth what they cost...nothing. Neither you, nor I, are going to change people's minds or actions. I don't understand the big deal about it. Are you applying for a postion of moral police? If so, you will end up arresting far more straights than gays...that will end your reign in that job. Again, "natural" is a non-discript term..what is natural for one is unnatural for another. I would be careful about tossing words like these around...more often than not, as soon as the word, "Natural" is used, the argument being made is lost.

Answer 5

Isn't the penis also designed to expell bodily waste, not to mention a womans sexual organs?

So, using your logic, if a man has had a vasectomy, or for that matter if a woman has been rendered sterile, should they never have sex again since reproduction is not possible? Should masterbation also be outlawed.

I sex had been intended for only reproduction, God would not have made it feel so darn good!

Answer 6

So are you saying a penis is not made for a mouth either? I mouth is made for eating, talking and breathing, but I bet you partake in oral sex? Also is it just not natural is it's a man's anus, or is it ok if it's a woman?

It'sd not a matter of defending what's right, it's a matter fo defending everyones personal freedom to decide what's right for themselves. If a woman truly hates intercourse, how can you be so pompous and arrogant as to say her vagina was made for penis? Sure you're gonna enjoy it, but she isn't. Is that all that matters to you. Your own perosnal enjoyment.

As a matter of fact it would be more natural for a man to be anally penetrated than a woman, since his prostrate is his "G spot" and will actually satisfy him to a varying levels. A woman has no prostate, therefore,, anal sex is pointless for her. But I guess some women enjoy it. That's their person choice and decision to make.

What's natural and pleasurable is subjective from person to person. You can no more dictate what;s right for others than we can dictate what's right for you.

That;s not even defense, just common sense.

BTW I have a question...who said that a persons only purpose in life is to reproduce?? That is APRT of it, but it is no more unnatural for homosexuals to have sex than it is for heterosexuals to use contraceptives, get their reproductive organs alterred or just opt not to have children at all. Who said thats a umans ONLY purpose,.. or the only purpose of sex. Just cuz we can;t produce a baby between us doesn;t make it wrong. It just means we can;t produce a baby...equivalent of one of us being infertile.

Answer 7

You're right, it's wrong.. but then there're so many other wrongs that we do everyday (and night). The right combination, which also seems natural, is the penis for the vagina - for enjoying sex as the homosapiens would never had been allured to procreate if there were no enjoyment in it. But the anus - and that too of 'mankind' as Bible says - is an end in itself. Do whatever you do, the getter would never 'climax'... only just the giver 'discharges'.

Answer 8

Can't admit something that isn't true. It is natural. I guess it depends how you define 'natural'.

Taking your argument to a logical conclusion, it would also be unnatural for a straight couple to have sex unless they were trying to conceive - and certainly any type of birth control would not be natural. It's definitely not natural to use drugs to kill STDs... And transplanting a heart... well, you get the picture.

Answer 9

Well what about women who have anal sex are you against that? And i laugh when ppl say animals dont do it so that means its not natural. I dont know how many hours i have sat and laughed my tail off becuse one of my dogs is gay. All he wants to do is hump the other male. He has never humped my female dog. Dont know why but I love him any way.

Answer 10

Whoever said the penis is only made for reproduction? And why do u even care?

Answer 11

Ermm, what does it mean to be natural? and whom decide what is considered natural?. Your definition is different to mine- but i guess that you are considered right as the ''penis is made for reproduction''.
I don't think that a man who sleeps with a man needs to justify his actions to anybody...including you.
What is wrong about the act? if s/he is recieving pleasure with that significant other. who are you to judge?...