yes I do, and so does the General Accounting Office of the US Government for all that's worth to anyone these days. the info is available and out there and verified, but the public has been trained to regard the information as contrived and bogus by the same people who conditioned the public to support these bastards anyways....links for you:
2006-07-28 13:20:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Michael R 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Wow. enable's see. the belief is that Bush exchange into waiting to rig an election so as that one and all the states are controlled, bringing the determination to a minimum of one state, his brother's. (A stunningly awesome action crowned via the main stupidly obtrusive determination) Then to rig that election so as that one and all the votes from 4-5 precincts interior the state are the finding out ingredient (And democrat-ruled precincts at that, what a flare for irony Bush has). Then to rig the balloting machines in those precincts so as that basically the proper type of democrats could fail to function them correct (That had to be real complicated). Then to regulate the proper courtroom of the two a state and a united states to rule against the putting chad crowd (wholesale corruption of our maximum sacred employer on a scale never in the past considered). And yet nonetheless cunning, beating his opponent via a much bigger margin than 25% of his predecessors elections in an ineffective attempt to teach that he gained the workplace legitimately. Boy, if the election exchange into rigged, there are alot of stupid (or corrupt) democrats accessible. There'd be a proof path as massive because of the fact the grand canyon, and the democratic management curiously can't trip in the time of it in the event that they have been shoved into it.
2016-11-03 05:38:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The margin in the next presidential election will be so great that the Republicans won't be able to fudge the results again.
2006-07-28 13:22:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by iknowtruthismine 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was all to evidentiary when they had to recount the votes during BUSH's first election, and then the sudden lost votes during the second election!!
Almost makes you think it's not really worth voting anymore
2006-07-28 13:19:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by bye 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Diebold = Rigged
2006-07-28 13:41:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with Amy H. If Kerry or Gore had won, I don't believe people would be asking this question.
2006-07-28 13:19:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mom of One in Wisconsin 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think every smart person knows, bush won the elections by cheating.
2006-07-28 13:21:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by persianempire6 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not necessarily rigged but definitely flawed.
2006-07-28 13:22:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sonie 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
you mean it makes some real tan gable difference,its about TV and gram mys baby,all in the scrip...
2006-07-28 13:31:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by CIVILIAN 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It definitely was the last time.
2006-07-28 13:29:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋