I'm just curious, I'm not saying its right or wrong.
2006-07-28 13:14:42 · 25 answers · asked by Samantha 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
i think many do a better job than some of the biological parents. or than half of their biological "parent" does anyway...
2006-07-28 14:33:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's the breeding ground (no pun intended) for tomorrow's serial killers, rapists, and miserable maladjusted misfits of every stripe. I feel so dreadfully sorry for those poor kids! How in the world are they ever to know the real, true, healthy beauty of the natural man-woman love upon which all human societies are founded? These innocent little ones, beloved of Jesus, who start out with so much bright promise, will instead grow into adults with diseased and stunted hearts. A dreadful, dreadful tragedy. And what kind of world leaders will these children make, who have at best an empty void where they should have been given a sense of morality and justice?
2006-07-28 20:45:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think raosing children is illegal here in the United States. But if they can spell better than you, the idea sounds okay to me!
2006-07-28 20:17:36 · answer #3 · answered by gaybobbarker 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In this day and age, all that matters is that the people be good parents. Sexual oreintation has nothing to do with being a good parent! Unfortunatly there are places that in this country (usa) a lot of ignorant people think that sexual oreintation is reason enough for kids to not stay in wonderful, loving homes.
2006-07-28 20:27:30 · answer #4 · answered by suequek 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obviously we are talking about adoption or maybe a lesbian having invitro fertilization .
By their choice nature won't provide a child.
I wonder if their kids will be confused, teased and bullied. Or just not happy with the situation.
It will make a interesting story, personally I think it would be better if they didn't have kids.
2006-07-28 21:02:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Everyone deserves to be a loving parent. I know of some wonderful gay couples who have raised wonderful kids and are quite productive in society. Live and let live!
2006-07-28 20:25:06 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as they love the child who cares. It wasn't to long ago that older women,(spinsters,old maids) who lived together would take in children from orphanages and raise them. I don't see that big of a difference as long as the child is loved and taken good care of.
2006-07-28 20:20:54 · answer #7 · answered by happy_jean 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let us! We're people too, and we're not going to "corrupt" our children just because we're gay. We can show them how to be tolerant and love people in general, and they won't grow up to be ignorant like the children raised in some other families.
2006-07-28 20:18:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not enough information given. The fact that they are homosexual is pretty much irrelevant to me; if they are both responsible, loving parents, then all is well. If they are not, then it is a bad idea.
2006-07-28 20:18:05 · answer #9 · answered by dpawson 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
my opinion: it's okay
but gotta think about the pyschological pespective for the child
so it's man and man, the child might grow up knowing nothing about female, or the child may grow up to like other men as well
and the same for woman and woman
2006-07-28 20:19:11 · answer #10 · answered by Rock 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
some people are good parents, most are okay, some are terrible. Which gender you go to bed with at night has no direct relation to how well you can take care of a household...
2006-07-28 20:18:55 · answer #11 · answered by jarm 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋