2006-07-28 09:36:54 · 9 answers · asked by TommyTrouble 4 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Earth Sciences & Geology
1 point for HOGHEAD 8-)
2006-07-28 19:10:51 · update #1
If man were not here, nobody would care what the temperature was. It wouldn't matter.
Proving Global Warming is due to man will be tough because science is tough. Even evolution is not a "Law", but still a "Theory". Right now GW is a hypothesis and is getting tested, but until there's a smoking gun it's up to us to decide if we want to try to pollute less or not. I choose to pollute less, drive less and be careful to recycle even if the highest scientific proofs are not complete yet. Remember how long it took to prove smoking caused cancer? (And there are still some holdouts since it doesn't ALWAYS cause cancer)
2006-07-28 14:09:30 · answer #1 · answered by n0witrytobeamused 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Based upon the climate change research reported in Science last year, the temperature would be about 2 degrees cooler.
2006-07-28 22:57:10 · answer #2 · answered by GREG P 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what would the earth's temperature be now, if dinasaurs had never lived here
nobody knows
nobody can know
you can't do the experiment both ways and see
same with effect of people
2006-07-28 16:50:29 · answer #3 · answered by enginerd 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If man were not here, the temperature couldn't be measured.
2006-07-29 01:42:18 · answer #4 · answered by Samurai Hoghead 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A lot cooler due to lack of body heat and global warming hehe...
2006-07-28 16:40:34 · answer #5 · answered by djpetramw 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Same. But the green house effect is manmade. may be little bit cooler
2006-07-28 17:08:25 · answer #6 · answered by Dr M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the exact same as it is now. Thats like saying "Do they have July 4th in England?"
2006-07-28 16:39:51 · answer #7 · answered by vanb11 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Juuuuuust right.
2006-07-28 16:41:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it could still be varying or maybe constant
2006-07-28 16:40:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋