thank u jesus(oh, can i say that on yahoo)? Its about time someone said something. You know, the things that people claim they are being persecuted for happened many generations ago, and as with most situations your mom would tell you to stop crying and get over it. I'm sorry it happened but its over and there's nothing we can do, now lets move on...
2006-07-28 09:42:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by beca 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Speaking of books, I suggest the reading of this title: The Death of Affirmative Action; The Proposed Model for the Candidate Selection Process into Law School. The Department of Justice assigned the proposal case no# DJ 169-73-0. In-Short, anyone denied admissions into law school now has the tools to challenge their denial. The author of the book is a former employee of the law school admissions council/services (LSAC/LSAS) organziation. The old folks knew of a way to resolve this issue. And with the our most trusted governing agency having the details with past history of the organization, the month of March '07 will prove to be very interesting especially with the MCRI controversey on the November ballot.
We now have the perfect storm in addressing the law school admissions selections process. The elements are: MCRI, the DOJ, The Texas State Attorney General, Two US Attorney Generals, Grutter & Hopwood, The Collegiate February Bake Sales, A former Law School Admissions Services employee, the proposal (now within the hands of the DOJ/Civil Rights Division).
A consequence should the proposal NOT be implemented, previous history with corruption defined on prior admissions (through Dollar Donations) accepted by the various law schools, The duress of the Graduate Loan Program by which nearly 60 Billion cannot be collected on education loans, The mass exit of nearly 732 thousand attorneys from the legal profession over the last 11 years, The upcoming ruling of the US Supreme Court on determining the outcome of your Social Society in liu of non-payment of your educational loans, Prof Sanders of UCLA and his research to change the course study permitting the average student to obtain a law degree so that they can practise law within the communities defined and the prospect of receiving a paycheck, an outcry for resolve by this nation.
Their is more to this issue on law school admissions and our government has now sought out individuals who can resolve the problem, without bias yet still ensure the academics of the law school candidate and their financials upon graduation. The business behind the business of the candidate selection process into law school. We have reached an impasse, they have sought answers.
Their are ways to solve these problems, but one must perform research as part of any writing !!!
But what the world will to come to understand is that the law school admissions entanglement has become a game. And with the winds now bitter in strength, strong and cold, this nation will undergo the challenge necessary in resolving this issue. First Law SChool, then Medical School and should we choose to finance the infrastructure for our undergraduate programs, we will achieve the results that we seek. Then onto public contracts and full employment.
With the knowledge and process now on the table, it will generate discussions that will entertain many thoughts as well as how to repay those who truely were discriminated against through a lucrative yet antiquated law school admissions process, acknowledging those denied access into the legal profession.........The Perfect Storm is on the Horizon !!!
2006-07-29 10:21:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Author 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is called REVERSE discrimination, not positive discrimination.
I think people are OVER using the term racism for one. Yes - qualified people should get the job, regardless of color.
People need to decide if we want fairness or protection. We also need to stop calling everything a racial issue. We work so hard to identify and name the problem, we are not spending enough time for the solution.
2006-07-28 09:39:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by tkquestion 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
It went to far decades ago when they started making laws telling people how to think and act towards others.
2006-07-28 09:39:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
ok what ever that mean .but i do agree with you my friend
2006-07-28 10:13:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by idontkno 7
·
0⤊
0⤋