2006-07-28 08:00:54 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Cowardly.
2006-07-28 08:02:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cowardly
2006-07-28 15:03:24 · answer #2 · answered by Ty W 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cowardly
2006-07-28 15:02:57 · answer #3 · answered by NyteWing 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it would depend on the context. I have no idea, but there may have been a point in time were the symbolism of burning the cross may have meant something completely different, perhaps even religiously motivated. For instance, the swastika was once a symbol (and still is in some parts of the world) for peace and love. It is only because a few bad apples got thier hands on it that it carries the connotation of today. Cross-burning may be the same thing. It might have meant something else before a bunch of rednecks got thier hands on it and started torching it in black peoples yards. Or maybe not.
2006-07-28 15:05:36 · answer #4 · answered by JCS 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cowardly..that's why the Klan wears white, pointy masks because they're afraid to show their faces. Ignorance is bliss for them.
2006-07-28 15:02:49 · answer #5 · answered by Lady Hurricane 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cowardly and just plain wrong.
2006-07-28 15:02:54 · answer #6 · answered by crystalg66 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ignorance!
2006-07-28 15:03:59 · answer #7 · answered by eva diane 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cowardly it is there (cowards attempt) to intimidate .
2006-07-28 15:07:08 · answer #8 · answered by danzka2001 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Expression guaranteed by the first amendment!
2006-07-28 15:08:56 · answer #9 · answered by ceprn 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if you're out of firewood, crosses burn quite nicely!
2006-07-28 15:04:05 · answer #10 · answered by pkingman1274 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋