should Larry Johnson be the first pick in drafts now that he doesnt have Willie Roaf
2006-07-28 07:57:48 · 7 answers · asked by Flash 2 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
Willie Roaf announced his retirement
http://www.nfl.com/nflnetwork/story/9575606
2006-07-28 08:11:43 · update #1
Either him, LT or Shaun Alexander
2006-07-29 21:05:34 · answer #1 · answered by Jersey's Franchise 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Between Willie Roaf retiring in KC, Steve Hutchinson out of Seattle, and an unproven QB situation in San Diego ... Larry Johnson should still get the nod as the #1 pick.
There will always be variables before the season starts, and this is just another example. His loss will be felt, but KC is known for establishing strong Offensive lines when they lose a player (John Tait was crucial on that line, until he left for Chicago ... KC did well without him).
LJ, Shaun, and LT in that order from first to third
2006-07-28 08:56:44 · answer #2 · answered by icehoundxx 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didn't know about Roaf - but this is a guy who ran for 1500+ yards in just the last 9 games in 2005. He's still the #1 overall pick.
2006-07-28 08:40:19 · answer #3 · answered by mikep426 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
While I think it might hurt him a little bit, I still think hes the NUMBER 1 PICK. Let me put it this way Willie Roaf will probably be a Hall of Famer, but in the last 2 years he's been battling injuries and just wasn't the same player, so initially you would think its gonna hurt, but they signed Kyle Turley (who is a VERY GOOD player) and he will take over and get the job done.
STILL TAKE LARRY JOHNSON FIRST
2006-07-28 08:56:06 · answer #4 · answered by Taylor C 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First running back but i dont think he's worth a top pick without roaf
2006-07-28 08:02:27 · answer #5 · answered by Jon 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LJ
2006-07-28 08:13:16 · answer #6 · answered by sportsfan89b 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wut do u mean he doesnt hav roaf?
2006-07-28 08:06:41 · answer #7 · answered by johnalds_1990 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋