English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-28 06:26:26 · 5 answers · asked by suburbsformeandme 1 in Politics & Government Politics

5 answers

i know what you mean, its WHAAACK

2006-07-28 19:17:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

It's too damn far from Denver, it's baggage system STILL doesn't work and you're forced to take shuttles everywhere. It's possibly among the worst, most inconvenient airports in the US, and there's no good reason for it to be so bad other than poor design and implementation. On top of that, it cost almost 3 TIMES it's orginal 1.7 Billion budget and it has LESS runways than it's predecessor, Stapleton, did. Can you say "Boondoggle?"

LAX is a pleasure compared to Denver.

2006-07-28 13:36:01 · answer #2 · answered by chairman_of_the_bored_04 6 · 0 0

Too much Taxpayer money spent on something that didn't pan out! But why should that surprise us? It's a government run bureaucracy.

2006-07-31 12:55:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What do you mean? The architecture? It's supposed to look like the mountains.

2006-07-28 13:29:46 · answer #4 · answered by Lee 7 · 0 0

what? its probably the nicest airport ever. at least the ones i've been to, and thats a lot.

2006-07-28 13:30:08 · answer #5 · answered by Alex F 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers