English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I hate him for all the death and descrution he has caused over personal beef and his unquenchable greed for money and power. Because of him and few people he surounds himself with, the world is a way way more dangerous place than before his stupid *** entered power.

2006-07-28 06:08:11 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

he's a pansy who sends young, brave kids to war yet this coward did not do any time.

he has the arrogance of a Salvador Dali or Lance Armstrong, yet has the intellence of a chimp.

i can go on and on, so i will stop. i would love to here others' reasons though. Thanks.

2006-07-28 06:10:34 · update #1

wow...i can see that the majority of people answering my question are my fellow americans...only they can still be so blind to the facts.

2006-07-28 06:18:31 · update #2

12 answers

Anyone who disputes this is simply ignorant of the truth or has been drinking the Neocon koolaid far too long....

Bush is easily the most despised world leader of our time (replacing Ariel Sharon). Numerous polls have been taken around the world with similar results saying that the majority of people believe Bush is a threat to world peace. Nearly every nation or continent he's visited has been the site of violent protests or demonstrations.

And don't forget the Muslim world. There are what, about 1.5 Billion of them on the planet? I'd say it's a safe bet that 90% plus aren't big fans of Bush, or any American for that matter.

Even NY Times centrist pundit Thomas Friedman says, "I have never known a time in my life when America and its president were more hated around the world than today. I was just in Japan, and even young Japanese dislike us. It's no wonder that so many Americans are obsessed with the finale of the sitcom "Friends" right now. They're the only friends we have, and even they're leaving."

But them I'm sure Hitler's supporters also felt he was a great man.....

2006-07-28 07:36:30 · answer #1 · answered by chairman_of_the_bored_04 6 · 0 0

Most conversal people are either loved or hated. Probably the best example of this is in American history... John F. Kennedy.

To some he was a great President, to others he was a mediocre President that started the U.S. envolment in the Vietnam war, and a failed war against Cuba.

I take the later view as the only thing he did right as President was call Russia's bluff on the Cubian missle crisis. If he wasn't assasinated, he would probably be remember for hardly anything else other than getting us in the Vietnam mess.

Only history and time will tell if G.W. Bush was a good President or not. He certainly was better than the alternative.

2006-07-28 06:22:16 · answer #2 · answered by Brad 1 · 0 0

well you answered your own question really. So why ask it? If you want to get a rise out of people then so be it. Personally Bush is Bush and you can't change it. He MIGHT be the most hated man on Earth but there is no proof. Then again he is the most famous as well. Is the world really more dangerous?

What is Newton 3rd law or whatever? For every action there is a equal or greater reaction. If it was not for the Muslims blowing up the World Trade Centers do you think the world would be like this? One event changes the course of history,

2006-07-28 06:14:48 · answer #3 · answered by Naddo 3 · 0 0

He's the most hated man because he can't afford to pay the whole world off.
He's liked by the people that he does "special" favors for. Like the already rich oil tycoons.
He did do one good thing while he was in office, and that is to prove to all Americans that we really dont live in a democracry. Our forefathers that shed their blood to provide their descendents a land "of the people, by the people, and for the people" must be rolling over in the graves.
If the majority of Americans are against the war, George Bush has broken his oath to uphold the Constitution of The United States. Which in basic terms reads "majority rules".
The only things that consoles me is to know that what comes around goes around. I dont think it was coincidental that Ken Lay died after stealing alot of American workers pensions.
Rest assured, as sure as the world turns, what Bush puts in the lives of others will come back in his in one way, shape or form.

2006-07-28 06:22:56 · answer #4 · answered by lilmissy 2 · 0 0

I don't think he is. And yes, while some of our people are being killed, the media fails to recognize that we are saving lives in the process. What is the death toll in Iraq? 3000? You know what the death toll was for Iraqis under Sadamm Hussein? 2 Mill +.
A lot of people take this guy for granted. If he really were evil, you think someone would have impeached him by now right? While he's not the brightest bulb on the Christmas Tree, this guy really is helping out in the world situation.

2006-07-28 06:15:12 · answer #5 · answered by mattiebouge 3 · 0 0

No thank you. those concepts have been quite annoying to me, "for the period of Bush's presidency, unemployment exchange into low, GDP exchange into extreme, client self assurance exchange into extreme, gasoline and oil expenditures have been low (different than while the Democrats brought about oil to bounce to $one hundred a barrel for a quick era) and usa's status interior the international exchange into extra proper than it ever were. " in case you probably did no longer be conscious there exchange right into a international recession that began on the top of Bush's presidency. The presidency has little or no administration over the booms and busts of our risky financial industry. additionally, who cares if oil is costly? If the U. S. quite had to be a frontrunner, we would make oil high priced and pour extra aspects into gaining capability independence. i'm specific you will additionally be bowled over to benefit that the international at large likes Obama as president. no less than our president isn't given the German Chancellor decrease back rubs interior the path of G-8 conferences.

2016-11-03 05:05:53 · answer #6 · answered by hartzell 4 · 0 0

Naddo, you can not put off Bush's going into Iraq on what happened on 9/11. While the response to going after Sadam Hussain may have been justified by the actions of that day, Bush's going into Iraq was on his private agenda. Moreover, I don't think there is any doubt that he is disliked internationally more than he is here at home and his numbers here at home are so low as to rate him one of the worst presidents in the history of this country.

2006-07-28 06:28:37 · answer #7 · answered by Sonie 5 · 0 0

Not the most hated man on earth.

Those who oppose wrong are always hated. Those who try and change things for the better will be hated by those who desire for things to remain the same.

2006-07-28 06:31:19 · answer #8 · answered by billybetters2 5 · 0 0

He may be disliked in the US by many, but I think it's a stretch to say that he is the most hated man in the entire world

2006-07-28 06:12:16 · answer #9 · answered by confetticupcakes 4 · 0 0

1) he rather solve things with war rather than peace talk.
2) he wasted government's money by starting a war which used a lot of resources
3) he didn't sign the Kyoto agreement - that provoke a lot of nations and the people

2006-07-28 06:19:32 · answer #10 · answered by jay-z 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers