English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-28 06:02:28 · 9 answers · asked by mariaoendari 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

9 answers

Cool...

I lived in the Middle East for three years and there was hardly any crime where I lived... at least not locally. I am more scared now, living in the US, where car jackings, home invasions and murder is an everyday thing on the news. You know, I have never heard about a serial killer in the Middle East.

T.

2006-07-28 06:09:57 · answer #1 · answered by Theophania 4 · 0 0

First cane the Muslims who violated that law and apply that on others? Don't test strenght of the cane on the back of non muslims and very weak (poor) muslims.

2006-07-28 06:09:24 · answer #2 · answered by SESHADRI K 6 · 0 0

non secular regulations has continuously been a skill of persecution and oppress its citizen and hold ability interior the call of religion. for hundreds of years this has been occurring, formerly it became the kings & queens in collaboration with the Church. This has additionally been a reason of many revolutions; 2 examples are the French Revolution and the Russian Revolution. most of the states persist with Islamic regulations (Sharia). the clarification in the back of following the Sharia is comparable because it became formerly oppress its citizen and or hold ability. With the oil gross revenues maximum of its citizen is truly cared of at modern-day in those monarchies yet they won't waiting to proceed to exist previous the subsequent 30 to 40 years. Sharia has very strict regulations, that's the only reason an mind-blowing form of the dictators of the Muslim majority states after toppling Democratic governments have opted to Sharia regulation. the clarification has been an identical oppress it citizen interior the call of religion with the only purpose of protecting ability. faith is a guy or woman decision at an identical time as state and its civil and criminal regulations is for the collective plenty. that's interior the interest of democracy and its plenty that those 2 at the instant are not mixed up as non secular regulations date decrease back to a century to one thousand’s of twelve months decrease back and what became uncomplicated than can't be appropriate at present. non secular regulations have on no account been effectual interior the previous and is truly sure fail interior the states decrease than non secular regulations interior the close to destiny.

2016-10-01 04:43:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Islam allows caning. Judaism and Christianity allow stoning to death.

I don't generally agree with corporal punishment, but at least it's not limited to just one religion or country.

2006-07-28 07:00:16 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0 0

I think that the ones doing and ordering the caning ought to be caned

2006-07-28 06:06:53 · answer #5 · answered by Dagblastit 4 · 0 0

To each his own. If its the culture, then so be it.

2006-07-28 06:06:44 · answer #6 · answered by Equinox 6 · 0 0

not practicable in today's world

2006-07-28 06:07:55 · answer #7 · answered by umeshmishra1969 2 · 0 0

We need it here.

2006-07-28 06:04:24 · answer #8 · answered by consigliere 6 · 0 0

If it works......................

2006-07-28 06:05:33 · answer #9 · answered by Wounded duckmate 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers