I think they should bring it to a close with immediate effect and stop hurting her beautiful children, they have had such a hard time as it is with all the media drivel and attention, just leave them alone I say and let them move on and remember Diana in the way they should be able to, with love and pride.
2006-07-29 11:51:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
It's about time they did. Diana's death was an accident but because she was famous and always in the news, the media couldn't just let it be that, could they. After all once the accident was reported it stops selling papers, so the 'conspiracy theory' was put into place. There have been countless stories ever since and millions of newspapers sold on the back of it. The problem is that these bloodsuckers have planted the seed so deeply that it will never go away. Couple that with the rantings of Mohammed Fayed, who wants to cause trouble for the Royals, and all those 'Saint Diana' lovers and even if the accident is proved beyond all possible doubt they'll just say that it's another cover-up. Problem is that if there, genuinely, is no cover-up it cannot be proved. How do you prove the non-existence of something that isn't there in the first place. By the way Fayed is not entitled to use the honorary 'al' before his name. This signifies someone important from a place so, for example, if an important person came from Tikrit he would be called al-Tikriti with a letter 'i' on the end. As he is not named Fayedi then he is not using the al for that. Otherwise it shows a chosen servant of God and there's no evidence of that either. His real name is Mohamed Abdel Moneim Fayed (Arabic: Ù
ØÙ
د اÙÙاÙد ) (b. January 27, c.1929) and he is an Egyptian-born, Swiss-based businessman. He styles himself Mohamed al-Fayed, the al being Arabic designation, which some of his critics contest he is not entitled to.
2006-07-28 06:29:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by quatt47 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why is her life worth more than the lives of countless others who are really murdered? Why waste money on a 'consipracy theory' when it could be put to much better use. If Charlie had her murdered he would only be acting true to type. Royals were mass murderers in the past and maybe it's in their genes. But let's get serious and concentrate on something that truly matters.
2006-07-28 08:05:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the Daily Express should get over it. Yes, she's dead. Move on. They don't 'stand for real values', they stand for being a cheap Daily Mail imitation who can't get over the fact that Diana wasn't wearing a seatbelt and keep trying desperately to find a way to slag the French off for her death.
2006-07-28 05:48:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by schmagum 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let's put it this way--they are still talking conspiracy theory in Marilyn Monroe's death---and she died in the 60s. If it continually sells magazines and newspapers, it will never die. Should they--yes. Will they---no.
2006-07-28 12:23:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by sidnee_marie 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
What the conspiracy theorists neatly forget about her death, is that Diana was killed because she wasn't wearing her seat belt. The bodyguard who was sat in front of her survived because he was wearing his. So if there was a conspiracy to kill her.....she was in on it!!!!!!!!!!
2006-07-28 05:43:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it should def. be dropped. She needs to rest in peace and be left alone. Its to bad people will never leave her alone...people are still coming up with theories on what "really" happened to JFK. Thats proof the talk wont go away anytime soon. :(
2006-07-28 07:45:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by christata32186 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think some people will always believe she was murdered, as long as people believe this I think it is hard to stop the controversy around her death.
2006-07-28 05:51:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think the truth will ever come out in out lifetime. For now let her rest in peace for the sake of her sons and family.
2006-07-29 00:46:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Louise 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well they will never prove rhat she was murdered, and I beleive she was knowing how easy it is for things to be covered up
2006-07-29 03:33:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by ringo711 6
·
0⤊
0⤋